...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >Effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic monotherapy in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study of patients registered in the Danish biologics registry
【24h】

Effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic monotherapy in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study of patients registered in the Danish biologics registry

机译:类风湿关节炎患者常规治疗中生物单一疗法的有效性和药物依从性:一项在丹麦生物制剂注册中心注册的患者的队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives. To estimate the prevalence of Danish RA patients currently on biologic monotherapy and compare the effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic therapies applied as monotherapy. Methods. All RA patients registered in the Danish biologics database ( DANBIO) as receiving biologic DMARD ( bDMARD) treatment as monotherapy without concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs ( csDMARDs) during the study period 1 May, 2011 through 30 April 2013 were eligible for inclusion. All patient files were checked to ensure that they were in accordance with the treatment registration in DANBIO. Descriptive statistics for prevalence, effectiveness and drug adherence of bDMARD monotherapy were calculated. Results. Of the 775 patients on bDMARD monotherapy, adalimumab ( 21.3%), etanercept ( 36.6%) and tocilizumab ( 15.3%) were the most prevalent biologic agents administered. At the 6- month follow- up, the overall crude clinical disease activity index remission rate in patients still on a biologic drug was 22%, the 28- joint DAS remission rate was 41% and the response rate of those with a 50% improvement in ACR criteria was 28%. At the 6- month follow- up, the drug adherence rates were similar for the different bDMARDs, with the exception of infliximab, which had significantly poorer drug adherence ( P< 0.001). The overall drug adherence ( except for infliximab) was approximately 70% after 2 years. Conclusion. Nearly one in five ( 19%) biologic treatments for RA was prescribed in Denmark as monotherapy, of which 70% were on monotherapy from bio- initiation and 30% were on monotherapy after cessation of a concomitant csDMARD. Acceptable drug adherence and remission rates were achieved with bDMARDs. With the exception of infliximab, no statistically significant differences were observed between anti- TNFs and biologics with other modes of action.
机译:目标。评估目前丹麦的RA患者接受生物单一疗法的患病率,并比较作为单一疗法应用的生物疗法的有效性和药物依从性。方法。在2011年5月1日至2013年4月30日期间研究期间,所有在丹麦生物制剂数据库(DANBIO)中注册为接受生物DMARD(bDMARD)治疗的RA患者均接受了生物DMARD(bDMARD)治疗,而未伴有常规的合成DMARD(csDMARD)治疗。检查所有患者档案,以确保它们符合DANBIO中的治疗记录。计算bDMARD单药治疗的发生率,有效性和药物依从性的描述性统计数据。结果。在bDMARD单药治疗的775例患者中,阿达木单抗(21.3%),依那西普(36.6%)和托珠单抗(15.3%)是最常用的生物制剂。在6个月的随访中,仍在使用生物药物的患者中,总体临床疾病活动指数的总体缓解率为22%,28关节DAS的缓解率为41%,改善率为50%的患者的缓解率在ACR标准中为28%。在6个月的随访中,不同的bDMARDs的药物依从率相似,但英夫利昔单抗除外,英夫利昔单抗的药物依从性较差(P <0.001)。 2年后,总体药物依从性(英夫利昔单抗除外)约为70%。结论。在丹麦,几乎有五分之一(19%)的RA生物疗法被指定为单一疗法,其中70%为从生物启动开始的单一疗法,而30%为停止伴随的csDMARD的单一疗法。 bDMARDs达到了可接受的药物依从性和缓解率。除英夫利昔单抗外,在抗TNFs和具有其他作用方式的生物制剂之间未观察到统计学上的显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号