...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology >The cost-effectiveness of etanercept in patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis in the UK.
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of etanercept in patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis in the UK.

机译:在英国,依那西普在重度强直性脊柱炎患者中的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To examine the costs and benefits associated with long-term etanercept (ETN) treatment in patients with severe ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the UK in accordance with the BSR guidelines. METHODS: A mathematical model was constructed to estimate the costs and benefits associated with ETN plus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) compared with NSAIDs alone. Individual patient data from Phase III RCTs was used to inform the proportion and magnitude of initial response to treatment and changes in health-related quality of life. A retrospective costing exercise on patients attending a UK secondary care rheumatology unit was used to inform disease costs. Published evidence on long-term disease progression was extrapolated over a 25-yr horizon. Uncertainty was examined using probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Over a 25-yr horizon, ETN plus NSAIDs gave 1.58 more QALYs at an additional cost of 35,978 pounds when compared with NSAID treatment alone. This equates to a central estimate of 22,700 pounds per QALY. The incremental cost per QALYs using shorter time periods were 27,600 pounds, 23,600 pounds and 22,600 pounds at 2, 5 and 15 yrs, respectively. Using a 25-yr horizon, 93% of results from the probabilistic analyses fall below a threshold of 25,000 pounds per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential cost-effectiveness of ETN plus NSAIDs compared with NSAIDs alone in patients with severe AS treated according to the BSR guidelines in the UK.
机译:目的:根据BSR指南,对英国重度强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的长期依那西普(ETN)治疗相关的成本和收益进行研究。方法:建立了一个数学模型,以估算与单独使用NSAID相比,ETN加非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID)的成本和收益。来自III期RCT的各个患者数据用于告知对治疗的初始反应的比例和大小以及与健康相关的生活质量的变化。对参加英国二级保健风湿病科的患者进行回顾性成本核算,以告知疾病费用。在25年的时间范围内推断出已发布的有关长期疾病进展的证据。使用概率敏感性分析检查不确定性。结果:在25年的时间范围内,与单独的NSAID治疗相比,ETN加NSAIDs提供了1.58个QALY,额外花费了35,978磅。这相当于每个QALY的中央估计值为22,700磅。使用较短时间段的每个QALY的增量成本分别为2年,5年和15年,分别为27600磅,23600磅和22600磅。使用25年的展望期,概率分析结果的93%低于每个QALY 25,000磅的阈值。结论:这项研究表明,根据英国的BSR指南,在严重AS患者中,ETN加NSAID与单独使用NSAID相比具有潜在的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号