首页> 外文期刊>Romanian journal of internal medicine >Left Atrial Surface Cut Point to Detect Trapezoidal Shape for Characterisation of Atrial Anatomical Remodeling
【24h】

Left Atrial Surface Cut Point to Detect Trapezoidal Shape for Characterisation of Atrial Anatomical Remodeling

机译:左心房表面切点以检测梯形形状以表征心房解剖重塑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Complete geometrical and shape characterization of left atrium has not been performed. Ellipse formula has been proved to underestimate the real LA volume. The aim of the study is to analyze the relation between LA area and shape in order to predict their value in the assessment of the severity of anatomical remodeling.Methods. 216 consecutive patients (pts) aged 53(+-)27 years were included. The following parameters were assessed: LA dimensions (LAd=M-mode, parasternal long axis, LAt and LAI are the measurements of short- and long-axis in apical four chamber view), LA surface in apical four chamber view (LAs). A new measurement was introduced, the basal dimension of the LA (LAb) as the maximal transverse distance at the base of LA apical four chamber view. LA measurements were calculated at end-systole (maximal). Trapezoidal LA shape was defined if transverse dimension < basal dimension.Results. LAs ranged 10.5-54.5cm2. Trapezoidal LA was found in 149 pts. ROC curve for prediction trapezoidal LA showed a 0.89 area under the curve. The analysis demonstrates a cutoff value of 22.3 cm2 for LAs to detect trapezoidal shape with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 82.5%. The simple regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant linear correlation between LAd and LAs (r2=0.63, p<0.0001) but LAI was better correlated with LAs (r~2=0.7, p<0.0001). Trapezoid LA with atrialization of the pulmonary veins and predominant dilatation of bazal atrium than annular side may explain underestimation of LA volume using ellipse formula.Conclusion. LAs is a reliable parameter and may be the best choice to estimate LA dilatation; LAs is related to shape remodeling; LAI is a better parameter than LAd for estimating LA dilatation and complete characterization of LA remodeling should include shape definition and LAb.
机译:背景。尚未完成左心房的完整几何和形状表征。椭圆公式已被证明低估了实际的LA体积。本研究的目的是分析LA面积与形状之间的关系,以预测其在解剖重塑程度评估中的价值。包括216位连续患者(pts),年龄53(+-)27岁。评估以下参数:LA尺寸(LAd = M型,胸骨旁长轴,LAt和LAI是在顶四腔视图中短轴和长轴的测量值),在顶四腔视图(LAs)中的LA表面。引入了一种新的测量方法,即LA的基本尺寸(LAb)作为LA顶四腔视图底部的最大横向距离。在收缩末期(最大)计算LA测量值。如果横向尺寸<基本尺寸,则定义为梯形LA形状。洛杉矶范围为10.5-54.5cm2。梯形LA被发现149分。预测梯形LA的ROC曲线显示曲线下面积为0.89。分析表明,用于检测梯形形状的LA的截断值为22.3 cm2,灵敏度为85%,特异性为82.5%。简单回归分析表明,LAd与LAs之间具有统计学意义的线性相关性(r2 = 0.63,p <0.0001),但LAI与LAs的相关性更好(r〜2 = 0.7,p <0.0001)。梯形LA伴有肺静脉的心房化和基底环比环状侧的主要扩张可能是用椭圆公式低估了LA体积的结论。 LAs是一个可靠的参数,可能是估计LA扩张的最佳选择。 LA与形状重塑有关;在估计LA扩张方面,LAI比LAd更好,而LA重塑的完整特征应包括形状定义和LAb。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号