...
首页> 外文期刊>Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering >Recalibration and Clarification of the Formula Applied to the ISRM-Suggested CCNBD Specimens for Testing Rock Fracture Toughness
【24h】

Recalibration and Clarification of the Formula Applied to the ISRM-Suggested CCNBD Specimens for Testing Rock Fracture Toughness

机译:重新校准和澄清用于ISRM建议的CCNBD标本以测试岩石断裂韧度的公式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The cracked chevron-notched Brazilian disc (CCNBD) was proposed by the International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM) to test the mode I (opening mode) fracture toughness of rock. The test method has been vigorously discussed and debated, despite being the subject of intensive research for decades. The minimum (critical) dimensionless stress intensity factors affiliated with the formula for calculating the fracture toughness using CCNBD specimens with different geometric parameters remain elusive and complex. The matter cannot be resolved by simply replacing the diameter in the original formula with the radius, as claimed by several authors. In this paper, the formula is fundamentally improved, as wide-ranging minimum dimensionless stress intensity factors pertaining to diversified CCNBD geometries are recalibrated by three-dimensional finite element analysis, and an expression with tabulated coefficients is obtained through curve-fitting the data obtained from the numerical calibration. The present results are shown to be more accurate than those in the literature. Furthermore, the importance of the reasonability of the results is highlighted; a comprehensive comparison of different values shows that the upper bounds of minimum stress intensity factors are violated by the above claim. The confusion resulting from the claim is, thus, clarified conclusively.
机译:国际岩石力学学会(ISRM)提出了开裂的V形缺口巴西圆盘(CCNBD),以测试岩石的I型(开放模式)断裂韧性。尽管数十年来一直是深入研究的主题,但该测试方法还是经过了激烈的讨论和辩论。与使用具有不同几何参数的CCNBD试样计算断裂韧性的公式相关的最小(临界)无因次应力强度因子仍然难以捉摸和复杂。如几位作者所声称的那样,不能简单地用半径替换原始公式中的直径来解决此问题。在本文中,该公式得到了根本性的改进,因为通过三维有限元分析重新校准了涉及多种CCNBD几何形状的广泛的最小无量纲应力强度因子,并通过对数据进行曲线拟合获得了具有列表系数的表达式。数值校准。目前的结果显示比文献中的结果更准确。此外,强调了结果合理性的重要性;对不同值的综合比较表明,上述要求违反了最小应力强度因子的上限。因此,结论明确了由权利要求书引起的​​混乱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号