...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >A randomised control trial to compare retention rates of two cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction methods in the novice
【24h】

A randomised control trial to compare retention rates of two cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction methods in the novice

机译:比较新手两种心肺复苏指导方法的保留率的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Studies show that after implementation of chest compression only CPR (CCC) in the community, there was an increase in bystander CPR rates and survival of OHCA victims. There have been very few studies to compare the retention rates of CCC and conventional CPR (CVC) in lay people.
机译:背景:研究表明,在社区中仅实施胸部按压后CPR(CCC),旁观者的CPR率和OHCA受害者的生存率都有所提高。很少有研究比较外行人群中CCC和常规CPR(CVC)的保留率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号