...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >A pilot study examining the role of regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring as a marker of return of spontaneous circulation in shockable (VF/VT) and non-shockable (PEA/Asystole) causes of cardiac arrest
【24h】

A pilot study examining the role of regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring as a marker of return of spontaneous circulation in shockable (VF/VT) and non-shockable (PEA/Asystole) causes of cardiac arrest

机译:一项初步研究,研究了区域性脑血氧饱和度监测作为自发性循环返回在心脏骤停的可休克(VF / VT)和非休克(PEA / Asystole)原因中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Non-invasive monitoring of cerebral perfusion and oxygen delivery during cardiac arrest is not routinely utilized during cardiac arrest resuscitation. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using cerebral oximetry during cardiac arrest and to determine the relationship between regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in shockable (VF/VT) and non-shockable (PEA/asystole) types of cardiac arrest. Methods: Cerebral oximetry was applied to 50 in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Results: Overall, 52% (n= 26) achieved ROSC and 48% (n= 24) did not achieve ROSC. There was a significant difference in mean. ±. SD rSO2% in patients who achieved ROSC compared to those who did not (47.2. ±. 10.7% vs. 31.7. ±. 12.8%, p<. 0.0001). This difference was observed during asystole (median rSO2 (IQR) ROSC versus no ROSC: 45.0% (35.1-48.8) vs. 24.9% (20.5-32.9), p<. 0.002) and PEA (50.6% (46.7-57.5) vs. 31.6% (18.8-43.3), p= 0.02), but not in the VF/VT subgroup (43.7% (41.1-54.7) vs. 42.8% (34.9-45.0), p= 0.63). Furthermore, it was noted that no subjects with a mean rSO2. <. 30% achieved ROSC. Conclusions: Cerebral oximetry may have a role as a real-time, non-invasive predictor of ROSC during cardiac arrest. The main utility of rSO2 in determining ROSC appears to apply to asystole and PEA subgroups of cardiac arrest, rather than VF/VT. This observation may reflect the different physiological factors involved in recovery from PEA/asytole compared to VF/VT. Whereas in VF/VT, successful defibrillation is of prime importance, however in PEA and asytole achieving ROSC is more likely to be related to the quality of oxygen delivery. Furthermore, a persistently low rSO2 <30% in spite of optimal resuscitation methods may indicate futility of resuscitation efforts.
机译:背景:在心脏骤停复苏过程中,通常不采用无创监测心脏骤停期间的脑灌注和氧输送。这项研究的目的是研究在心脏骤停期间使用脑血氧饱和度测定法的可行性,并确定在可电击(VF / VT)和不可电击(VF / VT)时区域性脑血氧饱和度(rSO2)与自发循环(ROSC)返回之间的关系。 PEA /心搏停止)类型的心脏骤停。方法:对50例住院和院外心脏骤停患者进行脑血氧饱和度测定。结果:总体而言,有52%(n = 26)达到了ROSC,有48%(n = 24)没有达到ROSC。均值存在显着差异。 ±。达到ROSC的患者与未达到ROSC的患者的SD rSO2%(47.2。±。10.7%vs. 31.7。±.8%,p <0.0001)。在心脏停搏期间(rSO2(IQR)中位ROSC与无ROSC相比)观察到这种差异:45.0%(35.1-48.8)vs. 24.9%(20.5-32.9),p <.0.002)和PEA(50.6%(46.7-57.5)vs. 31.6%(18.8-43.3),p = 0.02),但在VF / VT亚组中则不是(43.7%(41.1-54.7)vs. 42.8%(34.9-45.0),p = 0.63)。此外,注意到没有受试者具有平均rSO 2。 <。 30%达到了ROSC。结论:脑血氧饱和度可能作为心脏骤停过程中ROSC的实时,非侵入性预测指标。 rSO2在确定ROSC方面的主要用途似乎适用于心脏骤停的心搏停止和PEA亚组,而不是VF / VT。该观察结果可能反映了与VF / VT相比,从PEA /动脉粥样硬化恢复中涉及的不同生理因素。在VF / VT中,成功的除纤颤至关重要,但是在PEA和获得ROSC的非甾体中,更可能与氧气输送的质量有关。此外,尽管采用了最佳的复苏方法,但仍持续低于30%的rSO2可能表明复苏努力是徒劳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号