首页> 外文期刊>Review of Agricultural Economics >Are farmland preservation program easement restrictions capitalized into farmland prices? What can a propensity score matching analysis tell us?
【24h】

Are farmland preservation program easement restrictions capitalized into farmland prices? What can a propensity score matching analysis tell us?

机译:农田保护计划的地役权限制是否已转化为农田价格?倾向得分匹配分析可以告诉我们什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper re-examines the impact of agricultural easements on farmland sales prices, using an expanded data set of 3554 observations in 22 Maryland counties, including 249 preserved properties over 1997-2003. Hedonic models of parcel price suggest substantial and statistically significant reductions in price due to preservation, ranging from 11.4% to 16.9%. However, the results of a propensity score approach are quite different, taking advantage of a very strong predictor of programme participation - the distance to the closest preserved parcel (CONTIG). With CONTIG in the model, the estimated impact of preservation on price becomes small and statistically insignificant. This means that unrestricted land located near preserved parcels tends to sell for the same low price as the preserved land..
机译:本文通过使用马里兰州22个县的3554个观测值的扩展数据集(包括1997-2003年的249个保存的财产),重新审查了农业地役权对农田销售价格的影响。享乐价格的享乐主义模型表明,由于保存的原因,价格的大幅下降和统计学上的显着下降,范围从11.4%到16.9%。但是,倾向评分方法的结果却大不相同,它利用了程序参与的非常强的预测因子-距最近保存的包裹的距离(CONTIG)。在模型中使用CONTIG时,估计的保存对价格的影响会变小并且在统计上不显着。这意味着位于保护区附近的无限制土地往往以与保护区相同的低价出售。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号