...
首页> 外文期刊>Law and human behavior: The official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society >Identifying Gender Specific Risk/Need Areas for Male and Female Juvenile Offenders: Factor Analyses With the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY)
【24h】

Identifying Gender Specific Risk/Need Areas for Male and Female Juvenile Offenders: Factor Analyses With the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY)

机译:确定男女少年犯的性别特定风险/需要领域:通过结构分析评估青年中的暴力风险(SAVRY)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

By constructing risk assessment tools in which the individual items are organized in the same way for male and female juvenile offenders it is assumed that these items and subscales have similar relevance across males and females. The identification of criminogenic needs that vary in relevance for 1 of the genders, could contribute to more meaningful risk assessments, especially for female juvenile offenders. In this study, exploratory factor analyses (EFA) on a construction sample of male (n = 3,130) and female (n = 466) juvenile offenders were used to aggregate the 30 items of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) into empirically based riskeed factors and explore differences between genders. The factor models were cross-validated through confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) on a validation sample of male (n = 2,076) and female (n = 357) juvenile offenders. In both the construction sample and the validation sample, 5 factors were identified: (a) Antisocial behavior; (b) Family functioning; (c) Personality traits; (d) Social support; and (e) Treatability. The male and female models were significantly different and the internal consistency of the factors was good, both in the construction sample and the validation sample. Clustering riskeed items for male and female juvenile offenders into meaningful factors may guide clinicians in the identification of gender-specific treatment interventions.
机译:通过构建风险评估工具,其中针对男性和女性少年犯的单个项目的组织方式相同,可以假设这些项目和分量表在男性和女性之间具有相似的相关性。查明与1个性别有关的致犯罪性需求,可能有助于进行更有意义的风险评估,尤其是对未成年女性罪犯而言。在这项研究中,对男性(n = 3,130)和女性(n = 466)未成年人犯罪的建筑样本进行探索性因素分析(EFA),将青少年暴力风险的结构化评估(SAVRY)的30个项目汇总为基于经验的风险/需要因素,并探讨性别之间的差异。通过验证性因素分析(CFA)对男性(n = 2,076)和女性(n = 357)少年犯的验证样本进行交叉验证。在建筑样本和验证样本中,确定了5个因素:(a)反社会​​行为; (b)家庭运作; (c)人格特质; (d)社会支持; (e)可治疗性。在建筑样本和验证样本中,男性和女性模型均存在显着差异,并且这些因素的内部一致性良好。将男女青少年罪犯的风险/需要项目归纳为有意义的因素,可以指导临床医生确定针对性别的治疗干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号