...
首页> 外文期刊>Law and human behavior: The official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society >Assessing Nonchoosers' Eyewitness Identification Accuracy From Photographic Showups by Using Confidence and Response Times
【24h】

Assessing Nonchoosers' Eyewitness Identification Accuracy From Photographic Showups by Using Confidence and Response Times

机译:通过使用置信度和响应时间从摄影作品中评估非选择者的目击者识别准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While recent research has shown that the accuracy of positive identification decisions can be assessed via confidence and decision times, gauging lineup rejections has been less successful. The current study focused on 2 different aspects which are inherent in lineup rejections. First, we hypothesized that decision times and confidence ratings should be postdictive of identification rejections if they refer to a single lineup member only. Second, we hypothesized that dividing nonchoosers according to the reasons they provided for their decisions can serve as a useful postdictor for nonchoosers' accuracy. To test these assumptions, we used (1) 1-person lineups (showups) in order to obtain confidence and response time measures referring to a single lineup member, and (2) asked nonchoosers about their reasons for making a rejection. Three hundred and eighty-four participants were asked to identify 2 different persons after watching 1 of 2 stimulus films. The results supported our hypotheses. Nonchoosers' postdecision confidence ratings were well-calibrated. Likewise, we successfully established optimum time and confidence boundaries for nonchoosers. Finally, combinations of postdictors increased the number of accurate classifications compared with individual postdictors.
机译:尽管最近的研究表明,可以通过置信度和决策时间来评估阳性识别决策的准确性,但衡量阵容拒绝的成功率却较低。当前的研究集中在阵容拒绝中固有的两个不同方面。首先,我们假设,如果决策时间和置信度等级仅指单个阵容成员,则它们应该是识别拒绝的基础。其次,我们假设,根据非选择者做出决策的原因来划分非选择者可以作为非选择者准确性的有用预测指标。为了检验这些假设,我们使用(1)1人阵容(演出)来获得针对单个阵容成员的信心和响应时间,以及(2)向非选择者询问他们拒绝的理由。观看了2部刺激影片中的1部后,要求384名参与者识别2个不同的人。结果支持我们的假设。非选择者的决策后置信度等级得到了很好的校准。同样,我们成功地为非选择者建立了最佳时间和置信度边界。最后,与单个预测变量相比,预测变量的组合增加了准确分类的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号