...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Pre- and postconditioning effect of Sevoflurane on myocardial dysfunction after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in rats
【24h】

Pre- and postconditioning effect of Sevoflurane on myocardial dysfunction after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in rats

机译:七氟醚对大鼠心肺复苏后心肌功能障碍的预处理和后处理作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction is an important cause of death in the intensive care unit after initially successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of pre-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Volatile anaesthetics reduce ischaemic-reperfusion injury in regional ischaemia in beating hearts. This effect, called anaesthetic-induced pre- or postconditioning, can be shown when the volatile anaesthetic is given either before regional ischaemia or in the reperfusion phase. However, up to now, little data exist for volatile anaesthetics after global ischaemia due to CA. Therefore, the goal of this study was to clarify whether Sevoflurane improves post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction after CA in rats.Following institutional approval by the Governmental Animal Care Committee, 144 male Wistar rats (341±19g) were randomized either to a control group or to one of the 9 interventional groups receiving 0.25 MAC, 0.5 MAC or 1 MAC of Sevoflurane for 5min either before resuscitation (SBR), during resuscitation (SDR) or after resuscitation (SAR). After 6min of electrically induced ventricular fibrillation CPR was performed. Before CA (baseline) as well as 1h and 24h after restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), continuous measurement of ejection fraction (EF), and preload adjusted maximum power (PAMP) as primary outcome parameters and end systolic pressure (ESP), end diastolic volume (EDV) and maximal slope of systolic pressure increment (dP/dtmax) as secondary outcome parameters was performed using a conductance catheter.EF was improved in all Sevoflurane treated groups 1h after ROSC in comparison to control, except for the 0.25 MAC SDR and 0.25 MAC SAR group (0.25 MAC SBR: 38±8, p=0.02; 0.5 MAC SBR: 39±7, p=0.04; 1 MAC SBR: 40±6, p=0.007; 0.5 MAC SDR: 38±7, p=0.02; 1 MAC SDR: 40±6, p=0.006; 0.5 MAC SAR: 39±6, p=0.01; 1 MAC SAR: 39±6, p=0.002, vs. 30±7%). Twenty-four hours after ROSC, EF was higher than control in all interventional groups (p0.05 for all groups). EF recovered to baseline values 24h after ROSC in all SBR and SAR groups. PAMP was improved in comparison to control (4.6±3.0mW/μl2) 24h after ROSC in 0.5 MAC SBR (9.4±6.9mW/μl2, p=0.04), 1 MAC SBR (8.9±4.4mW/μl2, p=0.04), 1 MAC SDR (8.0±5.7mW/μl2, p=0.04), and 1 MAC SAR (7.3±3.5mW/μl2, p=0.04). ESP, EDV, and dP/dtmax was not different from control 1h as well as 24h after ROSC with the exception of 1 MAC SDR with a reduced ESP 1h after ROSC (89±16 vs. 103±22mmHg, p=0.04). Sevoflurane treatment did not affect survival rate.This animal study of CA and resuscitation provides the hypothesis that pharmacological pre- or postconditioning with the volatile anaesthetic Sevoflurane - administered before CA, during resuscitation or after ROSC - results in an improved myocardial inotropy 24. h after ROSC. Sevoflurane treatment seems to improve EF even in the early phase of reperfusion 1. h after ROSC. Therefore further targeted studies on the optimal dose and time point of administration of Sevoflurane in cardiopulmonary resuscitation seem to be worthwhile (Institutional protocol number: 35-9185.81/G-24/08).
机译:复苏后心肌功能障碍是重症监护病房在院前心脏骤停(CA)患者最初成功进行心肺复苏(CPR)后的重要死亡原因。挥发性麻醉剂可减少心脏跳动时局部缺血的局部缺血再灌注损伤。当在局部缺血之前或再灌注阶段给予挥发性麻醉剂时,可以显示出这种作用,称为麻醉诱导的预处理或后处理。然而,到目前为止,由于CA导致的局部缺血后,挥发性麻醉剂的数据还很少。因此,本研究的目的是弄清七氟醚是否可以改善大鼠CA后复苏后的心肌功能障碍。在获得政府动物护理委员会的机构批准后,将144只雄性Wistar大鼠(341±19g)随机分为对照组或对照组。在复苏(SBR)之前,复苏期间(SDR)或复苏之后(SAR)接受5分钟0.25 MAC,0.5 MAC或1 MAC七氟醚的9个干预组之一。电诱发心室纤颤6分钟后,进行CPR。在CA(基线)之前以及自发循环(ROSC)恢复后1h和24h,连续测量射血分数(EF),并预先加载调整后的最大功率(PAMP)作为主要结局参数和最终收缩压(ESP),使用电导导管进行舒张期容积(EDV)和收缩压增量的最大斜率(dP / dtmax)作为次要结果参数.ROSF后1h所有Sevoflurane治疗组的EF与对照组相比均有改善,除了0.25 MAC SDR和0.25 MAC SAR组(0.25 MAC SBR:38±8,p = 0.02; 0.5 MAC SBR:39±7,p = 0.04; 1 MAC SBR:40±6,p = 0.007; 0.5 MAC SDR:38±7, p = 0.02; 1 MAC SDR:40±6,p = 0.006; 0.5 MAC SAR:39±6,p = 0.01; 1 MAC SAR:39±6,p = 0.002,相对于30±7%)。 ROSC后24小时,所有干预组的EF均高于对照组(对于所有组,p <0.05)。在所有SBR和SAR组中,ROSC后24h EF恢复到基线值。与0.5%MAC SBR(9.4±6.9mW /μl2,p = 0.04),1 MAC SBR(8.9±4.4mW /μl2,p = 0.04)的ROSC后24小时相比,对照组的PAMP较对照(4.6±3.0mW /μl2)有所改善。 ,1个MAC SDR(8.0±5.7mW /μl2,p = 0.04)和1个MAC SAR(7.3±3.5mW /μl2,p = 0.04)。 ESC,EDV和dP / dtmax与ROSC术后1h和24h相比无差异,除了1个MAC SDR,ROSC后1h ESP降低(89±16 vs. 103±22mmHg,p = 0.04)。七氟醚的治疗不会影响存活率。这项关于CA和复苏的动物研究提供了这样的假设:在CA之前,复苏期间或ROSC后使用挥发性麻醉药Sevoflurane进行药理学前或后处理,可改善心肌的肌力。 ROSC。即使在ROSC后1小时再灌注的早期,七氟醚治疗似乎也可以改善EF。因此,关于在心肺复苏中七氟醚的最佳给药剂量和时间点的进一步针对性研究似乎是值得的(机构规程号:35-9185.81 / G-24 / 08)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号