首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Instructions to 'push as hard as you can' improve average chest compression depth in dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
【24h】

Instructions to 'push as hard as you can' improve average chest compression depth in dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

机译:有关“尽力推动”的说明,可提高调度员辅助心肺复苏术中胸部平均按压深度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with adequate chest compression depth appears to improve first shock success in cardiac arrest. We evaluate the effect of simplification of chest compression instructions on compression depth in dispatcher-assisted CPR protocol. METHODS: Data from two randomized, double-blinded, controlled trials with identical methodology were combined to obtain 332 records for this analysis. Subjects were randomized to either modified Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) v11.2 protocol or a new simplified protocol. The main difference between the protocols was the instruction to "push as hard as you can" in the simplified protocol, compared to push down firmly 2in. (5cm) ResusciAnne SkillReporter manikin. Primary outcome measures included: chest compression depth, proportion of compressions without error, with adequate depth and with total release. RESULTS: Instructions to "push as hard as you can", compared to "push down firmly 2in. (5cm)", resulted inimproved chest compression depth (36.4 mm vs. 29.7 mm, p<0.0001), and improved median proportion of chest compressions done to the correct depth (32% vs. <1%, p<0.0001). No significant difference in median proportion of compressions with total release (100% for both) and average compression rate (99.7 min(-1) vs. 97.5 min(-1), p<0.56) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions by changing push down firmly 2in. (5cm) in chest compression depth at no cost to total release or average chest compression rate.
机译:背景与目的:具有足够的胸部按压深度的心肺复苏(CPR)似乎可以改善心脏骤停的首次电击成功率。我们在调度员辅助的CPR协议中评估简化胸部按压指令对按压深度的影响。方法:将来自两个采用相同方法的随机,双盲,对照试验的数据相结合,以获得332条记录用于此分析。将受试者随机分配至改良的医学优先派遣系统(MPDS)v11.2协议或新的简化协议。协议之间的主要区别是简化协议中的“尽力而为”的指令,而不是坚决向下推2英寸。 (5厘米)ResusciAnne SkillReporter人体模型。主要的预后指标包括:胸部按压深度,没有错误的按压比例,足够的深度和完全的释放。结果:与“用力向下推2英寸(5厘米)”相比,“尽可能用力推”的说明可提高胸部按压深度(36.4毫米对29.7毫米,p <0.0001),并改善胸部中位比例压缩到正确的深度(32%对<1%,p <0.0001)。发现总释放量(两者均为100%)和平均压缩率(99.7 min(-1)vs. 97.5 min(-1),p <0.56)的中值压缩比例没有显着差异。结论:通过坚定地向下推2英寸来修改调度员辅助的CPR指令。 (5cm)的胸部按压深度不影响总释放量或平均胸部按压率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号