...
首页> 外文期刊>Respirology : >Benefits of fixed-dose combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators as initial maintenance therapy in the management of asthma.
【24h】

Benefits of fixed-dose combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators as initial maintenance therapy in the management of asthma.

机译:吸入皮质类固醇和长效支气管扩张剂的固定剂量联合治疗在哮喘管理中作为初始维持治疗的益处。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Revised Australian guidelines for asthma management were released by the National Asthma Council (NAC) in 2006. One area where clinical opinion and trial data have changed recently concerns the place of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting beta(2)-agonists as initial maintenance therapy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature commissioned by the NAC and undertaken by the University of Tasmania addressed several questions, including whether there was evidence for the use of FDC therapy as first-line asthma treatment in steroid-naive patients. RESULTS: Nineteen relevant studies were identified, from which 20 comparisons contributed to the analyses. The definition of steroid-naive ranged from no ICS therapy over the preceding 1 month to no ICS therapy ever. FDC therapy was effective in subjects who were steroid-naive and was more effective than an equivalent dose of ICS, irrespective of the definition of steroid-naivety. Compared with ICS alone, FDC therapy increased mean FEV(1) by 140 mL, mean morning PEF by 21 L/min and mean evening PEF by 20 L/min. There was a mean increase of 9.8% in symptom-free days, associated with a greater reduction in rescue medication use of -0.12 puff/24 h. FDC therapy was not superior to ICS alone for prevention of withdrawals or exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. Adverse events were similar for FDC therapy and ICS, whether ICS were administered at the same or an increased dose. CONCLUSIONS: FDC therapy is effective as first-line treatment in steroid-naive subjects and is superior to ICS alone for most outcomes, irrespective of the period of time since last exposure to ICS.
机译:背景与目的:澳大利亚哮喘理事会(NAC)于2006年发布了澳大利亚哮喘管理指南的修订版。最近,临床观点和试验数据发生变化的一个领域涉及吸入糖皮质激素的固定剂量联合治疗(FDC)的位置( ICS)和长效β(2)激动剂作为初始维持治疗。方法:由NAC委托塔斯马尼亚大学进行的文献的系统回顾解决了几个问题,包括是否有证据表明FDC疗法在未接受类固醇的患者中用作一线哮喘治疗。结果:确定了19项相关研究,从中进行了20项比较。初次使用类固醇的定义范围从前1个月未进行ICS治疗到从未进行过ICS治疗。 FDC治疗对未接受类固醇的受试者有效,并且与同等剂量的ICS相比更有效,而与未接受类固醇的定义无关。与单独的ICS相比,FDC治疗使平均FEV(1)增加140 mL,平均早晨PEF增加21 L / min,并且平均夜间PEF增加20 L / min。无症状日平均增加9.8%,与-0.12吹/ 24 h的急救药物使用减少更多有关。在预防需要全身性皮质类固醇的戒断或加重发作方面,FDC治疗并不优于单纯的ICS。 FDC治疗和ICS的不良事件相似,无论是以相同剂量还是增加剂量给药。结论:FDC治疗对于初治类固醇的受试者是有效的一线治疗,并且在大多数结局方面均优于ICS,而与自从上次接触ICS以来的时间无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号