首页> 外文期刊>Respirology : >Do all patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis warrant a trial of therapeutic intervention? A pro-con perspective
【24h】

Do all patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis warrant a trial of therapeutic intervention? A pro-con perspective

机译:所有患有特发性肺纤维化的患者是否都需要进行治疗干预试验?赞成观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an incurable condition that is characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis, architectural distortion of the lung and loss of gas exchange units. Until recently, there was no effective treatment for this condition. However, there were two landmark trials published earlier this year, which have changed the management of this condition. Pirfenidone (Assessment of Pirfenidone to Confirm Efficacy and Safety in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis trial) and nintedanib (Efficacy and Safety of Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis-1 and -2 trials) have both demonstrated positive outcomes in patients with IPF. In this perspective, we critically discuss the role of these agents in IPF and in the broader pulmonary fibrosis population.
机译:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种无法治愈的疾病,其特征是进行性肺纤维化,肺部结构变形和气体交换单位减少。直到最近,还没有针对这种情况的有效治疗方法。但是,今年早些时候发表了两项具有里程碑意义的试验,这些试验改变了这种情况的处理方法。吡非尼酮(吡非尼酮评估以确认特发性肺纤维化试验的疗效和安全性)和nintedanib(尼丁达布在特发性肺纤维化-1和-2试验中的有效性和安全性)均在IPF患者中均显示出阳性结果。从这个角度出发,我们批判性地讨论了这些药物在IPF和更广泛的肺纤维化人群中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号