首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Using heterogeneity and representation of ecosite criteria to select forest reserves in an intensively managed industrial forest.
【24h】

Using heterogeneity and representation of ecosite criteria to select forest reserves in an intensively managed industrial forest.

机译:使用异质性和生态场所标准表示法来选择集约经营的工业林中的森林保护区。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 189 000 ha privately owned, industrial Black Brook District in New Brunswick, Canada, contains 27 forest reserve areas, totaling 9500 ha (5%), with a primary management strategy of conservation protection. We conducted a gap analysis of the current reserve network, to evaluate representation by ecosite, and tested two approaches to identify potential additional reserves to increase to target areas of 6%, 7%, 10% and 15%: (1) selecting areas with maximum diversity of forest species composition, soil types, and elevation classes ('heterogeneity method', to incorporate the greatest amount of forest features in the smallest area); and (2) selecting areas to cover a total of 10% of the landbase, with 10% coverage of each ecosite area, if possible ('representation method'). With a 10% target, the heterogeneity and representation methods resulted in 29 and 42 reserves, ranging from 490-2000 to 50-1500 ha, respectively. The heterogeneity method resulted in 13 fewer reserves, 10% more core area, 30% larger mean patch size, and 30% less edge. Representation of ecosites ranged from 0.9% to 23.3% in the current reserve network, 6.7-26.5% for the heterogeneity method, and 8.0-26.4% for the representation method. In simulations of management scenarios with 39-64% plantations and 10% unharvested reserves, projected softwood harvest was similar with both methods, at 2.3-2.5 million m3 per 5-year period, while hardwood harvest was 0.02-0.09 million m3 higher, at 0.79-0.82 million m3 per 5-year period, with the representation than the heterogeneity method. Projected areas of old hardwood, softwood, and mixedwood habitats, defined based upon stand structure characteristics, were similar between the two methods, with up to 1000 ha more with the representation method in some projection periods. We conclude that the heterogeneity method was more effective in that it selected fewer reserves, with larger areas, more core area, and less edge..
机译:加拿大新不伦瑞克省18.9万公顷的私有工业布莱克布鲁克区,拥有27个森林保护区,总面积为9500公顷(5%),主要保护策略是保护森林。我们对当前的储备网络进行了差距分析,以评估生态站点的代表性,并测试了两种方法来确定潜在的额外储备,以增加到6%,7%,10%和15%的目标区域:(1)选择具有森林物种组成,土壤类型和海拔类别的最大多样性(“异质性方法”,以在最小面积内包含最大数量的森林特征); (2)选择可能覆盖总土地面积10%的区域,如果可能的话,每个生态站点区域覆盖10%的土地(“代表方法”)。以10%为目标,非均质性和代表性方法导致29和42的储量,分别从490-2000到50-1500公顷。异质性方法减少了13个储备,增加了10%的核心面积,增加了30%的平均贴片尺寸,减少了30%的边缘。当前保护区网络中生态站点的代表范围为0.9%至23.3%,非均质性方法的代表为6.7-26.5%,代表方法的则为8.0-26.4%。在以39-64%的人工林和10%的未采伐储量管理情景的模拟中,两种方法的预测软木采伐量相似,每5年为2.3-250万立方米,而硬木采伐量增加0.02-0.09百万立方米。每5年0.799-82万立方米,与非均质性方法相比具有代表性。根据林分结构特征定义的老硬木,软木和混合木生境的投影面积在两种方法之间是相似的,在某些投影期内,代表方法最多可增加1000公顷。我们得出的结论是,异质性方法更有效,因为它选择了更少的储量,具有更大的面积,更大的核心面积和更少的边缘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号