...
首页> 外文期刊>Reviews on recent clinical trials >Induction of Labour for Maternal Request: An Observational Study of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes
【24h】

Induction of Labour for Maternal Request: An Observational Study of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes

机译:为产妇请求引产:对产妇和胎儿结局的观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Induction of labour for reasons that medical professionals do not consider "medically indicated" is a difficult subject, both for women requesting it, as well as the medical professionals involved in their care. There is often a prejudice that induction will increase risks for mothers and babies, and therefore they try to avoid it. We aimed to look at this group of patients who request induction for a number of "non-medical" or "social" reasons, to see if maternal and fetal outcomes were any different. Materials and Methods: Compare term women requesting induction over an eighteen-month period with women undergoing routine induction for post dates over the same period at a University NHS Foundation Trust. 74 women requesting induction were compared with 124 women undergoing routine induction for post dates. A retrospective review of the notes of the study and control groups was performed. The results were statistically analysed. Main outcomes were mode of delivery and any serious maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality. Results: Women with a BMI of less than 30 are more to likely to achieve a vaginal birth in the maternal request group when compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed between other maternal and fetal outcomes. Conclusion: The results from this study add to the growing body of evidence that shows there is no increased risk of Cae-sarean section or other serious complications if women are induced for reasons thought to be not medically justified by medical professionals.
机译:目的:由于要求医学专业人士不认为“有医学适应症”的原因而引产是一个困难的课题,无论是要求该职业的妇女还是参与其护理的医学专业人员均如此。通常存在一种诱因,即引诱会增加母亲和婴儿的风险,因此他们设法避免这种情况。我们旨在研究由于多种“非医学”或“社会”原因而要求引产的这组患者,以查看母体和胎儿结局是否有所不同。资料和方法:比较大学NHS基金会信托基金在18个月内申请入职的足月妇女与同期接受常规入职的妇女。将74名要求入职的妇女与124名接受常规入职的妇女进行比较。对研究和对照组的笔记进行了回顾性审查。对结果进行统计学分析。主要结果是分娩方式以及任何严重的母亲或新生儿发病率或死亡率。结果:与对照组相比,BMI小于30的女性在母体请求组中更有可能实现阴道分娩。在其他母婴结局之间未观察到显着差异。结论:这项研究的结果增加了越来越多的证据,表明如果因医疗专业人员认为医学上不合理的原因诱使女性而导致剖腹产或其他严重并发症的风险不会增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号