...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Do asthmatic smokers benefit as much as non-smokers on budesonide/ formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy? Results of an open label study
【24h】

Do asthmatic smokers benefit as much as non-smokers on budesonide/ formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy? Results of an open label study

机译:在布地奈德/福莫特罗的维持和缓解治疗中,哮喘吸烟者与不吸烟者一样受益吗?开放标签研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Studies with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in smoking asthmatics have mostly shown poorer treatment responses than in non-smoking asthmatics. Methods: EuroSMART, an open, randomised, 6-month study, compared budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort ? Turbuhaler?) h maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART?) at two maintenance doses of budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 μg), 1 × 2 and 2 × 2, in patients with asthma who were symptomatic despite treatment with ICS ± long-acting β 2-agonists. The 8424 randomised patients included 886 smokers (11%; aged 40 years or with a smoking history 10 pack-years if older), who were compared with a propensity-matched group of non-smokers. At baseline, smokers had lower post-bronchodilator peak expiratory flow, lower peak flow reversibility and used more reliever medication per day. Severe asthma exacerbations were counted and changes in five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores from baseline calculated. Results: There were 48 and 47 exacerbations in smokers and non-smokers, respectively. Mean time to first severe exacerbation was not statistically different between the two groups. The mean change in ACQ-5 score was significantly greater in non-smokers. Considering the two treatment options there was a statistically significant prolonged time to first severe exacerbation with 2 × 2 versus 1 × 2 in the smokers, but not in the non-smokers. In smokers, the reductions in ACQ-5 scores, asthma symptoms, use of as-needed medication and awakenings were also all significant in favour of 2 × 2 with similar or greater changes than in smokers treated with 1 × 2. Conclusion: Asthmatic patients with a limited smoking history benefit from treatment with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy with dosing 2 × 2 being superior to 1 × 2.
机译:背景:吸烟哮喘患者中吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)的研究显示,其治疗反应较不吸烟哮喘患者更差。方法:EuroSMART,一项开放,随机,为期6个月的研究,比较了两种维持剂量的布地奈德/福莫特罗(160 / 4.5μg)下布地奈德/福莫特罗(Symbicort?Turbuhaler?)的维持和缓解治疗(Symbicort SMART?)1 ×2和2×2,尽管接受ICS±长效β2受体激动剂治疗但仍有症状的哮喘患者。将8424名随机患者包括886名吸烟者(11%;年龄<40岁或吸烟史<10包年(如果年龄较大)),与倾向匹配的非吸烟者进行比较。在基线时,吸烟者的支气管扩张剂后峰值呼气流量较低,峰值流量可逆性较低,并且每天使用更多的缓解药物。对严重的哮喘发作进行计数,并计算出基线的五项哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-5)得分的变化。结果:吸烟者和非吸烟者分别加剧了48和47。两组之间第一次严重加重的平均时间无统计学差异。非吸烟者ACQ-5得分的平均变化显着更大。考虑到这两种治疗方法,吸烟者首次严重加重的时间在统计学上显着延长,吸烟者为2×2比1×2,而非吸烟者则没有。在吸烟者中,ACQ-5得分的降低,哮喘症状,按需使用药物和觉醒的发生也均显着,有利于2×2的患者,其变化与接受1×2治疗的吸烟者相似或更大。结论:哮喘患者吸烟史有限的患者可使用布地奈德/福莫特罗维持治疗和缓解治疗,剂量2×2优于1×2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号