...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care clinics of North America >Do all mechanically ventilated pediatric patients require continuous capnography?
【24h】

Do all mechanically ventilated pediatric patients require continuous capnography?

机译:所有机械通气的儿科患者都需要连续进行二氧化碳描记术吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With most patients in modern ICUs requiring mechanical ventilation, any technology that may lead to more optimal ventilatory strategies would be invaluable in the management of critically ill patients. The focus of most ventilator strategies is protecting the lung from the deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation. Every effort is made to minimize the duration of mechanical ventilation while optimizing the potential for successful extubation. A concise organized plan based on objective criteria that is adjusted to meet changes in patient status is clearly recommended. Continuous capnographic monitoring provides clinicians with clear, precise, objective data that may prove beneficial in the design and implementation of mechanical ventilatory strategies. There are no clear-cut methods for achieving the optimal ventilator strategy for a specific patient. Although guidelines and management theories exist throughout the medical literature, in practice, they often merely serve as loose guidelines. The dynamic properties of an acutely ill patient make the management of mechanical ventilation an ongoing process requiring clinical assessment and planning by multidisciplinary members of the patient care team. Comprehensive evaluation of ventilatory management strategies and patient responses must be made by a collaborative effort of physicians, respiratory care practitioners, and nurses. An objective, consistent approach to the overall management is essential. Although still controversial, it is the authors' opinion that volumetric capnograph provides the data necessary to establish adequate gas delivery, optimal PEEP, and effective ventilation with the least amount of mechanical assistance, regardless of clinician or institutional preferences.
机译:由于现代ICU中的大多数患者需要机械通气,因此任何可能导致更理想的通气策略的技术对于危重患者的管理都是无价的。大多数呼吸机策略的重点是保护肺部免受机械通气的有害影响。尽一切努力使机械通气时间最短,同时最大程度地提高成功拔管的可能性。明确建议基于客观标准的简明有组织的计划,该计划应进行调整以满足患者状况的变化。连续的二氧化碳监测为临床医生提供了清晰,准确,客观的数据,这些数据可能被证明对机械通气策略的设计和实施有益。没有明确的方法可以实现针对特定患者的最佳呼吸机策略。尽管医学文献中存在指导原则和管理理论,但在实践中,它们通常仅用作宽松的指导原则。急症患者的动态特性使机械通气的管理成为一个持续的过程,需要患者护理团队的多学科成员进行临床评估和计划。通气管理策略和患者反应的综合评估必须在医师,呼吸保健医生和护士的共同努力下进行。客观,一致的整体管理方法至关重要。尽管仍存在争议,但作者认为,容积式二氧化碳分析仪可提供必要的数据,以建立足够的气体输送,最佳的PEEP和有效的通气,并以最少的机械协助,而不考虑临床医生或机构的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号