首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care >High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Bag-Valve-Mask for Preoxygenation Before Intubation in Subjects With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
【24h】

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Bag-Valve-Mask for Preoxygenation Before Intubation in Subjects With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

机译:低氧性呼吸衰竭患者插管前的高流量鼻导管对袋阀面罩预充氧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients with respiratory failure undergoing intubation have an increased risk of hypoxemia-related complications. Delivering oxygen via a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has theoretical advantages and is increasingly used. This study was conducted to compare HFNC with bag-valve-mask (BVM) for preoxygenation and to assess oxygenation during intubation in subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial including 40 critically ill subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure who received either HFNC or BVM for preoxygenation before intubation in the ICU. The primary outcome was the mean lowest S-pO2 during intubation. RESULTS: The mean lowest S-pO2 during intubation was 89 +/- 18% in the HFNC group and 86 +/- 11% in the BVM group (P = .56). In subjects receiving HFNC, a significant increase in S-pO2 after preoxygenation was only seen in those previously receiving low-flow oxygen (P = .007), whereas there was no significant difference in S-pO2 in subjects previously receiving noninvasive ventilation or HFNC (P = .73). During the 1 min of apnea after the induction of anesthesia, S-pO2 dropped significantly in the BVM group (P = .001), whereas there was no significant decrease in the HFNC group (P = .17). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups at any of the predefined time points before or after intubation concerning S-pO2, P-aO2/F-IO2, and P-aCO2. CONCLUSIONS: Preoxygenation using HFNC before intubation was feasible and safe compared with BVM in critically ill subjects with acute, mild to moderate hypoxemic respiratory failure. There was no significant difference in the mean lowest S-pO2 during intubation between the HFNC and the BVM group. There was also no significant difference in S-pO2 between the 2 groups at any of the predefined time points. However, on continuous monitoring, there was a significant decrease in S-pO2 during the apnea phase before intubation in the BVM group, which was not seen in the HFNC group.
机译:背景:患有严重呼吸衰竭的气管插管患者发生低氧血症相关并发症的风险增加。通过高流量鼻导管(HFNC)输送氧气具有理论上的优势,并且越来越多地被使用。进行这项研究的目的是将HFNC与袋气门面罩(BVM)的预充氧进行比较,并评估低氧性呼吸衰竭受试者在插管过程中的充氧。方法:本研究是一项随机对照试验,包括40名重度低氧性呼吸衰竭的重症患者,他们在将ICU插管之前接受HFNC或BVM进行预加氧。主要结局是插管期间平均最低S-pO2。结果:HFNC组的平均最低S-pO2为89 +/- 18%,BVM组的平均最低S-pO2为86 +/- 11%(P = .56)。在接受HFNC的受试者中,仅在先前接受低流量氧气的受试者中预氧后S-pO2显着增加(P = .007),而在先前接受无创通气或HFNC的受试者中S-pO2没有显着差异(P = .73)。在麻醉诱导后的呼吸暂停1分钟内,BVM组S-pO2显着下降(P = .001),而HFNC组则没有显着下降(P = .17)。在插管之前或之后的任何预定时间点,两组之间关于S-pO2,P-aO2 / F-IO2和P-aCO2均无显着差异。结论:与BVM相比,在急性,轻度至中度低氧血症性呼吸衰竭的危重患者中,在插管前使用HFNC预充氧是可行和安全的。 HFNC和BVM组在插管期间的平均最低S-pO2没有显着差异。在任何预定义的时间点,两组之间的S-pO2也没有显着差异。但是,在连续监测中,BVM组在插管前的呼吸暂停阶段S-pO2显着下降,而在HFNC组中则没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号