首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Effect of a Heated Breathing Tube on Efficacy, Adherence and Side Effects during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
【24h】

Effect of a Heated Breathing Tube on Efficacy, Adherence and Side Effects during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

机译:持续呼吸道正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停期间,加热的呼吸管对功效,粘附和副作用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Heated breathing tubes were developed to improve heated humidification in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Objectives: We wanted to investigate the influence of a heated breathing tube on patients' satisfaction with the treatment, the rate of side effects and the adherence to treatment. Methods: Eighty-eight patients with primarily diagnosed OSAS were treated in a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial for 12 months either with a CPAP system plus conventional heated humidifier or with a CPAP system plus heated humidifier and an integrated heated breathing tube. Results: Both systems improved the respiratory disturbances and the quality of sleep in a similar manner. The difference in the overall satisfaction with the treatment (subscale 3 of the visual analogue scale) between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant (mean difference - 14.1, 95% CI - 28.7 to 0.6; p = 0.059). The rate of side effects and the quality of life did not differ significantly between the two groups. The patients with the heated breathing tube used the treatment on average 1 h longer, but this was not statistically significant (4.96 +/- 1.95 vs. 3.90 +/- 2.54 hight; p = 0.06). Conclusions: Controlled heated breathing tube humidification as compared to conventional heated humidification improves neither the adherence to treatment, nor the rate of side effects, nor the quality of life in nonselected OSAS patients. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:开发了加热呼吸管,以改善阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症(OSAS)患者持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗中的加热加湿。目的:我们想研究加热呼吸管对患者对治疗的满意度,副作用发生率和治疗依从性的影响。方法:在一项随机,对照,单盲试验中,对88例最初诊断为OSAS的患者进行了为期12个月的随机试验,即采用CPAP系统加常规加湿器或采用CPAP系统加加热加湿器和集成式加热呼吸管。结果:两种系统均以相似的方式改善了呼吸系统不适和睡眠质量。两个治疗组之间对治疗的总体满意度差异(视觉模拟量表的3级子量)无统计学意义(平均差异为14.1,95%CI为28.7至0.6; p = 0.059)。两组之间的副作用发生率和生活质量没有显着差异。带加热呼吸管的患者平均使用治疗时间延长了1小时,但这在统计学上并不显着(4.96 +/- 1.95 vs. 3.90 +/- 2.54 h / night; p = 0.06)。结论:与传统的加热加湿相比,控制加热的呼吸管加湿既没有改善对治疗的依从性,也没有改善副作用的发生率,也没有改善未选择的OSAS患者的生活质量。 (C)2016 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号