...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Comparison of the efficacy of beclometasone dipropionate and fluticasone propionate suspensions for nebulization in adult patients with persistent asthma.
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy of beclometasone dipropionate and fluticasone propionate suspensions for nebulization in adult patients with persistent asthma.

机译:成年持续性哮喘患者雾化倍氯米松二丙酸酯和丙酸氟替卡松混悬液的雾化效果比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The use of nebulization for the administration of inhaled steroids plays an important role in asthma patients who are unable to use pressurized aerosol or dry-powder inhalers effectively. Moreover, the type of nebulizer used may affect how much drug is delivered to the lungs. The objective of this multinational, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids in adult patients with chronic asthma. Following a 1-week placebo run-in period, 205 patients, aged 18-65 years, with moderate persistent asthma were randomized to one of two treatment groups for 12 weeks: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) suspension for nebulization 2,400 microg day(-1) b.i.d. (n = 103), or fluticasone propionate (FP) suspension for nebulization 2,000 microg day(-1) b.i.d. (n = 102), both administered by a jet nebulizer Comparable efficacy in controlling asthma was demonstrated by the two treatments at study end, as evident when evaluating variousefficacy parameters (pulmonary function tests, asthma exacerbations and symptoms, and the use of rescue salbutamol).The primary efficacy endpoint was the variation in the pulmonary expiratory flow (PEF) at treatment end over the baseline visit. For the intent-to-treat population, in the BDP group mean PEF values increased statistically significantly from 5.2 +/- 1.31 s(-1) to 5.7 +/- 1.61 s(-1), while in the FP group the increase was from 5.2 +/- 1.21 s(-1) to 5.8 +/- 1.81 s(-1). Mean PEF values as per cent of predicted also increased in a statistically significant way, from 71% to 77.1 % in the BDP group, and from 70.1% to 76.9% in the FP group. The two treatments were equally well tolerated.A total of 23 and 32 patients in the BDP and FP groups, respectively, reported adverse events during the treatment period, and these were generally mild. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that BDP 2,400 microg day(-1) and FP 2,000 microg day(-1), both suspensions for nebulization administered via a jetnebulizer, are equally effective, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, when used in adult patients with moderate persistent asthma.
机译:在无法有效使用加压气雾剂或干粉吸入器的哮喘患者中,雾化吸入类固醇的给药起着重要作用。此外,使用的雾化器类型可能会影响向肺部输送多少药物。这项多国,多中心,随机,主动控制,平行分组研究的目的是比较雾化糖皮质激素对成年慢性哮喘患者的疗效和安全性。经过1周的安慰剂磨合期后,将205例年龄在18-65岁,患有中度持续性哮喘的患者随机分为两个治疗组之一进行为期12周的治疗:雾化倍氯米松二丙酸酯(BDP)雾化治疗2,400 microg day(-1) ) 出价(n = 103),或丙酸氟替卡松(FP)悬浮液,每天雾化2,000微克(-1)。 (n = 102),均由喷射雾化器给药在研究结束时,两种治疗方法均证明了控制哮喘的等效疗效,在评估各种功效参数(肺功能测试,哮喘加重和症状以及使用沙丁胺醇的使用)时很明显主要疗效终点是基线随访期间治疗结束时肺呼气流量(PEF)的变化。对于意向性治疗人群,BDP组的平均PEF值从5.2 +/- 1.31 s(-1)到5.7 +/- 1.61 s(-1)显着增加,而FP组从5.2 +/- 1.21 s(-1)到5.8 +/- 1.81 s(-1)。平均PEF值也达到了统计学上的显着提高,BDP组从71%增至77.1%,FP组从70.1%增至76.9%。两种疗法的耐受性均相同.BDP组和FP组分别有23和32例患者报告了在治疗期间的不良事件,且一般较轻。总之,这项研究的结果表明,当通过喷射雾化器雾化的悬浮液BDP 2,400 microg day(-1)和FP 2,000 microg day(-1)时,它们的雾化效果相同,安全性和耐受性均可接受。用于成人中度持续性哮喘患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号