首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory care >Use of a Shared Canister Protocol for the Delivery of Metered-Dose Inhalers in Mechanically Ventilated Subjects
【24h】

Use of a Shared Canister Protocol for the Delivery of Metered-Dose Inhalers in Mechanically Ventilated Subjects

机译:使用共享罐协议在机械通气对象中输送定量吸入器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients often need bronchodilators administered via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Unfortunately, there are no data examining the impact of shared canister delivery of MDI therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: A prospective trial was conducted with subjects assigned to shared canister MDI therapy or single-patient canister MDI therapy. Outcomes assessed were occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), hospital mortality, length of stay, ventilator-associated events, and MDI costs. RESULTS: Among 486 screened patients, 353 were included for analysis of which 201 (56.9%) received shared canister MDI therapy and 152 (43.1%) received single-patient canister therapy. VAP (7.0% vs 4.6%, P =.35), hospital mortality (21.9% vs 20.4 %, P =.73), and ventilator days (median [interquartile range] 3.1 [0.9-7.5] d vs 2.7 [1.2-7.1] d, P =.62) were similar between the shared canister and single-patient canister groups. We did not observe clinically important differences for ventilator-associated events between study groups in our logistic regression analysis (P =.07). There was a savings of $217/subject in the shared canister group due to the use of 299 fewer MDIs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that shared canister MDI therapy compared with single-patient MDI use was associated with a significant cost savings and similar rates of VAP, hospital mortality, and length of stay but a greater prevalence of ventilator associated events. This finding suggests that shared canister delivery of MDIs may be a cost-effective practice in mechanically ventilated patients. Based on our findings, further studies examining the overall safety of shared canister use in mechanically ventilated patients seem warranted before recommending their routine use.
机译:背景:机械通气患者通常需要通过定量吸入器(MDI)施用支气管扩张剂。不幸的是,目前尚无数据检查MDI共用罐式治疗对机械通气患者的影响。方法:一项前瞻性试验是针对被分配到共享罐MDI治疗或单人罐MDI治疗的受试者进行的。评估的结果是呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发生,医院死亡率,住院时间,呼吸机相关事件和MDI费用。结果:在486例筛查患者中,包括353例进行分析,其中201例(56.9%)接受了共用罐式MDI治疗,152例(43.1%)接受了单人罐式治疗。 VAP(7.0%vs 4.6%,P = .35),医院死亡率(21.9%vs 20.4%,P = .73)和呼吸机天数(中位[四分位间距] 3.1 [0.9-7.5] d vs 2.7 [1.2- [7.1] d,P = .62)在共享容器组和单患者容器组之间相似。我们在逻辑回归分析中未观察到研究组之间呼吸机相关事件的临床重要差异(P = .07)。由于减少了299个MDI,共享容器组中的每个主题节省了217美元。结论:我们的研究发现,与单人使用MDI相比,共用罐式MDI治疗可节省大量成本,VAP发生率,医院死亡率和住院时间相近,但呼吸机相关事件的发生率更高。这一发现表明,在机械通气患者中,MDI的分罐递送可能是一种经济有效的做法。根据我们的发现,在推荐常规使用之前,有必要进行进一步研究以检查机械通气患者使用共用罐子的总体安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号