...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Inhaled ethanolic and aqueous solutions via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler are well-tolerated in asthma patients.
【24h】

Inhaled ethanolic and aqueous solutions via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler are well-tolerated in asthma patients.

机译:通过Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler吸入的乙醇和水溶液在哮喘患者中耐受良好。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) is a new-generation inhaler offering improved lung deposition compared with other devices. Bronchodilators administered via Respimat SMI are preserved and stabilized with benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA); both have been reported to cause paradoxical bronchoconstriction if a threshold dose is exceeded. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, three-period, crossover study was to establish that the safety of inhaled ethanolic and aqueous placebo solutions (containing BAC and EDTA) is equivalent to that of inhaled normal saline solution when administered to asthma patients via Respimat SMI. METHODS: Thirty-seven asthma patients with airway hyper-reactivity were randomized to receive four actuations of each of the following three treatments via Respimat SMI, one on each of 3 study days: ethanolic placebo (12 microl 96% ethanol + 0.13 mug EDTA/actuation), aqueous placebo (12 microl water + 5.5 microg EDTA + 1.1mug BAC/actuation), and normal saline (12 microl 0.9% sodium chloride/actuation). Pulmonary function tests were performed at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after inhalation; the primary endpoint was the lowest FEV(1) recorded between 0 and 30 min. RESULTS: The mean lowest FEV(1) recorded between 0 and 30 min after inhalation minus the study day baseline was -0.090 litres for ethanolic placebo, -0.121 litres for aqueous placebo and -0.094 litres for normal saline (SEM 0.034 litres for all). The mean treatment differences were: ethanolic placebo versus normal saline 0.004 litres (90% CI -0.075-0.083 litres, p = 0.002), and aqueous placebo versus normal saline -0.028 litres (90% CI -0.107-0.052 litres, p = 0.006). Since both 90% CIs fell within the pre-determined equivalence region of +/-0.15 litres, both treatments were considered equivalent to normal saline. CONCLUSION: Ethanolic and aqueous solutions administered via Respimat SMI are safe with regard to paradoxical bronchoconstriction in asthma patients with airway hyper-reactivity.
机译:背景:Respimat软雾吸入器(SMI)是新一代吸入器,与其他设备相比可提供改善的肺部沉积。通过Respimat SMI给药的支气管扩张药可以保存并用苯扎氯铵(BAC)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)稳定;据报道,如果超过阈值剂量,两者都会引起自相矛盾的支气管收缩。目的:这项随机,双盲,三期,交叉研究的目的是确定吸入性乙醇和安慰剂水溶液(含BAC和EDTA)的安全性与哮喘患者吸入生理盐水的安全性相等患者通过Respimat SMI。方法:37例气道高反应性哮喘患者被随机分配通过Respimat SMI接受以下三种治疗方法中的每种方法的四次促动,每3个研究日中的一种:乙醇安慰剂(12微升96%乙醇+ 0.13杯EDTA /活化剂),水性安慰剂(12微升水+ 5.5微克EDTA + 1.1杯BAC /活化)和生理盐水(12微升0.9%氯化钠/活化)。在基线和吸入后5、15、30、60、120和180分钟进行肺功能测试;主要终点是0至30分钟之间记录的最低FEV(1)。结果:吸入后0到30分钟之间的平均最低FEV(1)减去研究日的基线值:乙醇安慰剂为-0.090升,水性安慰剂为-0.121升,生理盐水为-0.094升(所有SEM为0.034升) 。平均治疗差异为:乙醇安慰剂与生理盐水0.004升(90%CI -0.075-0.083升,p = 0.002)和水性安慰剂与生理盐水-0.028升(90%CI -0.107-0.052升,p = 0.006) )。由于两种90%的CI均在+/- 0.15升的预定当量范围内,因此两种处理均被视为等同于生理盐水。结论:通过Respimat SMI给予的乙醛和水溶液对于患有气道高反应性哮喘患者的反常支气管收缩是安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号