...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Rapid on-site evaluation improves needle aspiration sensitivity in the diagnosis of central lung cancers: A randomized trial
【24h】

Rapid on-site evaluation improves needle aspiration sensitivity in the diagnosis of central lung cancers: A randomized trial

机译:快速的现场评估可提高对中心型肺癌诊断的针吸敏感性:一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Few prospective studies have evaluated the role of endobronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing central airways neoplasms. Rapid on-site evaluation has long been used in transbronchial needle aspiration of adenopathies and peripheral lesions, but its role in sampling central malignancies has not been substantiated yet. Objectives: In this study we evaluated if endobronchial needle aspiration may increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy for diagnosing central airways neoplasms when added to conventional diagnostic methods (forceps biopsy, brushing and bronchial washing), and if rapid on-site evaluation may be beneficial in patients undergoing endobronchial needle aspiration. Methods: 125 patients (77% males, aged 70 ± 7 years; mean ± SD) with central lung cancers were randomized to undergo bronchoscopy including conventional diagnostic methods and needle aspiration, with or without rapid on-site evaluation, stratifying the patients on the basis of the neoplasm growth pattern (exophytic and submucosal/peribronchial disease). Results: Needle aspiration significantly increased the sensitivity of bronchoscopy when added to conventional methods (from 76 to 91%; p < 0.001), primarily resulting from differences in submucosal/peribronchial diseases (68 vs. 90%; p < 0.001) and independently from the presence of rapid on-site evaluation; needle aspiration guided by rapid on-site evaluation guaranteed a higher improvement in bronchoscopy sensitivity than conventional needle aspiration (98 vs. 84%, respectively; p = 0.004). Needle aspiration guided by rapid on-site evaluation showed a significantly higher sensitivity than the conventional method (97 vs. 76%, respectively; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Needle aspiration increases the sensitivity of bronchoscopy in diagnosing central airways malignancies when added to conventional diagnostic methods, with a further significant improvement when guided by rapid on-site evaluation.
机译:背景:很少有前瞻性研究评估了支气管内针吸在诊断中央气道肿瘤中的作用。长期以来,快速现场评估一直用于经支气管穿刺针抽吸腺病和周围病变,但尚未证实其在中心性恶性肿瘤采样中的作用。目的:在这项研究中,我们评估了在常规诊断方法(镊子活检,刷洗和支气管清洗)中添加支气管内针抽吸术是否可提高支气管镜诊断中央气道肿瘤的敏感性,以及快速的现场评估是否对患者有益接受支气管内针抽吸。方法:将125例中心型肺癌患者(男性占77%,年龄70±7岁;平均数±SD)随机接受包括常规诊断方法和针穿刺在内的支气管镜检查,无论是否进行快速现场评估,均将患者分层。肿瘤生长方式(外生性和粘膜下/支气管疾病)的基础。结果:针吸术在常规方法中添加时显着提高了支气管镜检查的敏感性(从76%增至91%; p <0.001),这主要是由于粘膜下/支气管疾病的差异(68%vs. 90%; p <0.001)和独立于快速的现场评估;快速现场评估指导的针吸保证了支气管镜检查灵敏度比常规针吸更高(分别为98%和84%; p = 0.004)。快速现场评估指导的针吸术显示出比传统方法显着更高的敏感性(分别为97%对76%; p = 0.001)。结论:针吸术与常规诊断方法相结合,可增加支气管镜在诊断中央气道恶性肿瘤中的敏感性,并在快速现场评估的指导下进一步显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号