【24h】

Households' recycling efforts

机译:家庭回收工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Households' recycling effort is often argued to be of an insignificant size. It is also frequently argued that this contribution, if significant, is not a cost to households, since it is voluntary. Thus households' use of time and energy are frequently disregarded in cost-benefit analyses of stricter recycling targets. In this survey, based on 1162 interviews, we find that sorting at source involves significant extra use of time and energy in the households. On average, each of those asked reported that they use close to half an hour a weak for leaning, sorting and transporting recyclable waste. On average, 185 h is used per tonne of waste. Four out of ten reported that they use ward or hot water to clean the materials. When investigating the motives for sorting waste, we find that many perceive sorting as mandatory, while some in fact find it a pleasant activity in itself. Moral motives for sorting at source are also widespread. A majority would prefer that a company took over the sorting if this were possible, and on average, the respondents are willing to pay US
机译:人们经常认为,家庭的回收工作规模微不足道。人们也经常争辩说,这种贡献,如果是重大的,则不是家庭的成本,因为它是自愿的。因此,在更严格的回收目标的成本效益分析中,家庭的时间和能源使用经常被忽略。在基于1162个访谈的调查中,我们发现从源头上进行分类会涉及家庭中大量的时间和精力消耗。平均而言,每个被问到的人都报告说,他们在倾倒,分类和运输可回收废物方面消耗了将近半小时的时间。每吨废物平均使用185小时。十分之四的人报告说他们使用病房或热水清洗材料。在调查分类垃圾的动机时,我们发现许多人认为分类是强制性的,而实际上一些人认为分类本身是一项令人愉快的活动。从源头上进行分类的道德动机也很普遍。如果可能的话,大多数人希望由公司接管排序,平均而言,受访者愿意向美国付款

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号