首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Recycling of construction and demolition waste via a mechanical sorting process
【24h】

Recycling of construction and demolition waste via a mechanical sorting process

机译:通过机械分选过程回收建筑和拆除废物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper assesses a construction and demonstration (C&D) waste recycling program in relation to technical, institutional, and economic considerations. The focus is primarily placed on a feasibility study for a new mechanical sorting process that was installed with several unit operations, including bar screening, trommel screening, air classifier, disk screening, and final manual sorting. Lab analyses, consisting of sieve analysis, LA abrasion test, friability test, organic content test, and fineness test, with respect to three types of product streams (A, B, and C) were conducted in accordance with selected physical and chemical properties. Findings clearly indicate that the reuse of fine particle generated in product stream A as construction materials in roadbed is highly recommended if the impurities can be removed beforehand. The product stream B could be suitable for reusing as the covering materials in daily operation of sanitary landfills. Yet it could also be used as backfill materials in the construction projects if the impurities can be removed in advance. Only does the LA abrasion test support the reuse of product stream C as coarse aggregate or pavement subbase for those new structures. Once the secondary materials market is stable and the institution settings are sufficient, it is worthwhile addressing that the associated cost-benefit analysis does confirm the economic potential for such a management practice.
机译:本文根据技术,机构和经济方面的考虑,评估了建筑和示范(C&D)废物回收计划。重点主要放在针对新的机械分选过程的可行性研究中,该过程已通过多个单元操作进行安装,包括棒筛,滚筒筛,空分机,圆盘筛和最终人工分选。根据选定的物理和化学性质,针对三种类型的产品流(A,B和C)进行了由筛分分析,LA磨耗测试,脆性测试,有机物含量测试和细度测试组成的实验室分析。研究结果清楚地表明,如果可以事先清除杂质,则强烈建议将产品流A中产生的细颗粒用作路基建筑材料。产品流B可能适合在卫生垃圾填埋场的日常操作中用作覆盖材料。如果可以事先清除杂质,它也可以在建筑项目中用作回填材料。 LA耐磨性测试仅支持将产品流C用作这些新结构的粗骨料或路面基层。一旦二级材料市场稳定并且机构设置足够,值得解决的是相关的成本效益分析确实确认了这种管理实践的经济潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号