首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Basic petrochemicals from natural gas, coal and biomass: Energy use and CO2 emissions
【24h】

Basic petrochemicals from natural gas, coal and biomass: Energy use and CO2 emissions

机译:来自天然气,煤炭和生物质的基本石化产品:能源使用和CO2排放

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While high-value basic petrochemicals (HVCs) are mostly produced through conventional naphtha and ethane-based process routes, it is also possible to produce them through coal and biomass-based routes. In this paper, we compared these routes in terms of energy use and CO2 emissions per ton of HVCs. (The term ton and abbreviation t should be read in this paper as a metric ton or 1000 kg.) Within the cradle-to-grave system boundary, we found the following: The total energy use of the conventional routes is the lowest (about 60 GJ/t HVCs, of which 50 GJ is the calorific value of HVCs) whereas that of the methane-based routes is 30% higher, and that of the coal and biomass-based routes is about 60-150% higher. The total CO2 emissions of conventional and methane-based routes are about 4-5 tons CO2/t HVCs whereas those from the biomass-based routes range from 2 tons CO2/t HVCs (a maize-based ethanol related route) to 4 tons CO2 avoided per ton HVCs (a lignocellulosic biomass-based Fischer-Tropsch route). Avoided CO2 emissions are due to electricity co-generation. The total CO2 emissions of coal-based routes are by far the highest (8-11 tons CO2/t HVCs). An exception is a coal-based route with CO2. capture and sequestration features, for which CO2 emissions are similar to those of the conventional routes. It is technically possible to add CO2 Capture and sequestration features to any of the routes mentioned above. Given the large differences shown above, more research into energy efficiency improvement of coal and biomass-based routes is recommended. However, the total energy use of biomass and coal-based routes is unlikely to match that of the conventional state-of-the-art routes any time soon.
机译:尽管高价值的基础石化产品(HVC)主要通过常规的石脑油和乙烷工艺路线生产,但也有可能通过煤炭和生物质工艺路线生产它们。在本文中,我们从每吨HVC的能源消耗和CO2排放方面比较了这些路线。 (吨和缩写t在本文中应以公吨或1000千克来表示。)在从摇篮到坟墓的系统范围内,我们发现以下几点:常规路线的总能源消耗最低(约60 GJ / t HVC,其中50 GJ是HVC的热值),而基于甲烷的路线的发热量要高30%,而基于煤和生物质的路线的发热量要高60-150%。传统路线和甲烷路线的总二氧化碳排放量约为4-5吨CO2 / t HVC,而生物质路线的二氧化碳排放量从2吨CO2 / t HVC(基于玉米的乙醇相关路线)到4吨CO2每吨HVC避免使用(基于木质纤维素生物质的费-托路线)。避免的CO2排放源于热电联产。迄今为止,以煤炭为基础的航线的二氧化碳总排放量最高(8-11吨二氧化碳/吨高浓煤)。一个基于煤的二氧化碳排放途径是一个例外。捕获和封存功能,其二氧化碳排放量与常规路线类似。从技术上讲,可以将二氧化碳捕集和封存功能添加到上述任何路线中。鉴于上面显示的巨大差异,建议对煤和生物质路线的能源效率改善进行更多研究。但是,生物质和煤基路线的总能源使用不可能在短期内与传统的最先进路线相匹配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号