首页> 外文期刊>Retina >RANIBIZUMAB MONOTHERAPY VERSUS SINGLE-SESSION VERTEPORFIN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY COMBINED WITH AS-NEEDED RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
【24h】

RANIBIZUMAB MONOTHERAPY VERSUS SINGLE-SESSION VERTEPORFIN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY COMBINED WITH AS-NEEDED RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

机译:雷尼单抗单药治疗与维他命原单药光动力疗法联合必要的雷尼单抗治疗,用于管理与年龄相关的血管性黄斑变性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare verteporfin photodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal ranibizumab (combination therapy) versus ranibizumab monotherapy for management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Methods: Thirty patients (40 eyes) with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were prospectively allocated to combination therapy or monotherapy. In monotherapy, the induction phase consisted of 3 consecutive monthly ranibizumab injections (0.5 mg), while the combination therapy had a single session of photodynamic therapy with intravitreal ranibizumab. Follow-up treatment for either group consisted only of additional as-needed ranibizumab injections. The main outcome measure was that a proportion of eyes losing <15 letters of visual acuity after 12 months.Results: Except for 1 eye in combination therapy, all eyes in both groups lost <15 letters of visual acuity. At 12 months, there was a mean gain of +12 letters and +3.2 letters for monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively (relative percent change of 32% vs. 7%, P = 0.03). Anatomical improvement was similar in both groups. After induction, the time until ranibizumab retreatment was longer for combination therapy (P = 0.002) while ranibizumab injections were required more frequently with monotherapy (P = 0.015).Conclusion: Ranibizumab monotherapy showed greater improvement in visual acuity versus combination therapy. However, combination therapy required fewer ranibizumab injections. Larger trials need to confirm the findings of this pilot study.
机译:目的:比较Verteporfin光动力疗法与玻璃体内雷珠单抗联合治疗与雷珠单抗单药治疗新血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的方法。方法:前瞻性将30例40眼新血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的患者分配为联合治疗或单一疗法。在单一疗法中,诱导期包括连续3个月每月注射雷珠单抗(0.5 mg),而联合治疗则采用玻璃体内雷珠单抗单次光动力疗法。两组的随访治疗仅包括其他必要的兰尼单抗注射剂。主要结果指标是12个月后有一部分眼睛失去了<15个字母的视力。结果:除联合治疗中有1只眼外,两组的所有眼睛都失去了<15个字母的视力。在12个月时,单一疗法和联合疗法的平均获益分别为+12个字母和+3.2个字母(相对百分比变化为32%对7%,P = 0.03)。两组的解剖学改善相似。诱导后,联合应用雷珠单抗再治疗的时间更长(P = 0.002),而单一疗法则需要更频繁地注射雷珠单抗(P = 0.015)。结论:与联合疗法相比,雷珠单抗单药治疗的视力有了更大的改善。然而,联合疗法需要更少的兰尼单抗注射剂。较大的试验需要确认该初步研究的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号