...
首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Immersion B-guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes.
【24h】

Immersion B-guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes.

机译:浸入式B引导与接触式A模式生物测定法可用于在硅化的眼中精确测量轴长和计算人工晶状体能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of the immersion B-guided versus the contact A-mode biometry in measuring the axial length and intraocular lens power of the siliconized eyes. METHODS: Sixty eyes with silicone cataract were divided into two groups. In Group A, the axial length of 30 eyes was measured by contact A-mode biometry. In Group B, the axial length of 30 eyes was measured by immersion B-guided biometry. The postoperative refraction was done after 3 months and was compared with the attempted values. RESULTS: Twenty-five eyes of the B-guided group (83.3%) achieved a refraction deviation of +/- 1 D or less versus 14 (46.6%) in the A-mode group. The mean refractive deviation was less with the B-mode (0.15 +/- 0.94) versus contact A-mode (-0.95 +/- 1.157); the difference is statistically significant (P = 0.024, Fisher test). CONCLUSION: B-guided biometry was found to be more accurate than the contact method in measuring axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes and spared the time and cost needed for a separate B-scan.
机译:目的:比较浸入式B引导和接触式A模式生物测量在测量硅化眼睛的轴向长度和人工晶状体屈光度方面的准确性。方法:将60只患有有机硅白内障的眼睛分为两组。在A组中,通过接触A模式生物测定法测量30只眼的轴长。在B组中,通过浸入式B引导生物测定法测量30只眼的轴长。 3个月后进行术后验光,并与尝试值进行比较。结果:B引导组的25眼(83.3%)的屈光偏差为+/- 1 D或更小,而A模式组为14(46.6%)。与接触A模式(-0.95 +/- 1.157)相比,B模式下的平均折射率偏差较小(0.15 +/- 0.94);差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.024,Fisher检验)。结论:在硅化眼中测量轴向长度和人工晶状体屈光度时,B引导生物测定法比接触法更准确,并且省去了单独进行B扫描所需的时间和成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号