...
首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Re: Must screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity necessarily be painful?
【24h】

Re: Must screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity necessarily be painful?

机译:回复:筛查早产儿视网膜病变一定会很痛苦吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Dear Editor:We read with interest the article "Must screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity necessarily be painful?" by Kirchner et al.We appreciate their use of a rigorous method for assessment of pain and stress response in neonates during retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening examinations.However, we have a few concerns about the conclusions drawn from the study that indirect ophthalmoscopy without scleral indentation is sufficient for screening of ROP because it is less stressful and takes less time. Our first concern is regarding the methodology used in the study. The study has not addressed the efficacy of the screening procedure without a speculum with any data about the diagnosis of ROP in the two groups. Interob-server variability of findings was not mentioned, and there is no masking involved in the study.
机译:亲爱的编辑:我们很感兴趣地阅读了文章:“筛查早产儿视网膜病变一定一定很痛苦吗?”我们赞赏他们采用了一种严格的方法来评估早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)筛查检查期间新生儿的疼痛和压力反应,但是我们对研究得出的结论有些担忧,即间接眼底镜检查无需镜检巩膜压痕足以用于ROP筛查,因为它的压力较小且花费的时间较少。我们首先关心的是研究中使用的方法。这项研究没有探讨筛查程序的有效性,而没有窥镜,并且没有关于两组ROP诊断的任何数据。没有提及观察者之间的服务器间差异,并且该研究没有掩盖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号