首页> 外文期刊>Retina >25-Gauge sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
【24h】

25-Gauge sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

机译:25规格无缝玻璃体切除术与20规格玻璃体切除术用于修复原发性血源性视网膜脱离。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomic and visual results and complications of 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus conventional 20-gauge vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.METHODS: A retrospective comparative analysis of 125 consecutive eyes from 125 patients with a minimum of 3 months follow-up was performed. All patients underwent primary vitrectomy with complete fluid air exchange, gas tamponade, and laser retinopexy. Excluded were eyes with prior retinal or vitreous surgery, and patients with inadequate follow-up. Sixty-four patients underwent 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy and 61 patients underwent 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy from September 2004 to April 2007. Primary endpoints included one surgery retinal reattachment success rate, visual outcomes, postoperative intraocular pressures and complications as determined by standard clinical evaluation.RESULTS: Baseline demographic and preoperative ocular characteristics showed no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts. The mean follow-up interval was 305.4 days for the 25-gauge group and 452.4 days for the 20-gauge group. The single operation success rate with one procedure was 58/64 (90.6%) for 25-gauge cases and 56/61 (91.8%) for 20-gauge cases, Fisher Exact Test (P = 0.801). All cases were attached at final follow-up and the anatomic success rate was 100% for each of the two cohorts. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/125 and 20/169 for 25-gauge and 20-gauge cases, respectively (P > 0.5). The final follow-up mean BCVA was 20/34 and 20/36 for the 25-gauge and 20-gauge groups, respectively (P > 0.6). In the 25-gauge group two cases were complicated by hypotony that resolved uneventfully and one case developed postoperative choroidal and vitreous hemorrhage. In the 20-gauge group there was one case of sterile endophthalmitis and one case of vitreous hemorrhage.CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy and 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
机译:目的:比较25线经结膜无缝玻璃体切除术与传统20线玻璃体切除术治疗原发性视网膜源性视网膜脱离的解剖学和视觉结果及并发症。方法:回顾性比较分析来自125例患者的125眼连续眼睛,最小进行3个月的随访。所有患者均进行了原发玻璃体切除术,并进行了完全的液体空气交换,气体填塞和激光视网膜手术。排除了此前曾进行过视网膜或玻璃体手术的眼睛以及随访不足的患者。从2004年9月至2007年4月,有64例患者行了25线经结膜无缝玻璃体玻璃体切割术,有61例行了20尺的平面内玻璃体玻璃体切割术。主要终点包括一项手术视网膜复位成功率,视觉效果,术后眼压和并发症(按标准确定)结果:基线人口统计学和术前眼部特征显示两组之间无统计学差异。 25针组的平均随访间隔为305.4天,而20针组的平均随访间隔为452.4天。采用Fisher精确检验(P = 0.801),采用25号规的单次手术成功率为58/64(90.6%),对于20号规的单次手术成功率为56/61(91.8%)。所有病例均在最后随访时依附,两个队列的解剖学成功率均为100%。 25眼和20眼患者的术前最佳矫正视力(BCVA)分别为20/125和20/169(P> 0.5)。对于25号和20号组,最终随访平均BCVA分别为20/34和20/36(P> 0.6)。在25线规组中,有2例并发低渗,并不能很好地缓解,1例发生了术后脉络膜和玻璃体出血。结论:20号玻璃体行结膜无缝玻璃体切除术与20号玻璃体玻璃体切除术在修复原发性血源性视网膜脱离方面没有显着差异,其中20号组无菌性眼内炎1例,玻璃体出血1例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号