...
首页> 外文期刊>Retina >Efficacy of 1.25 MG versus 2.5 MG intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema: six-month results of a randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Efficacy of 1.25 MG versus 2.5 MG intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema: six-month results of a randomized controlled trial.

机译:1.25 MG与2.5 MG玻璃体内贝伐单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效:一项随机对照试验的六个月结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of two different dosages of bevacizumab (Avastin) for treating diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Fifty-two eyes of 52 patients with diabetic macular edema were randomized to receive three monthly intravitreal injections of 1.25 mg or 2.5 mg bevacizumab. Patients were observed for 6 months and optical coherence tomography central foveal thickness, logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients completed the 6-month follow-up and were analyzed. Significant mean central foveal thickness reductions were observed in both groups at all follow-up visits (P < 0.013). Significant improvements between baseline and 6-month mean logMAR BCVAs were seen, with the mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.63 to 0.52 in the 1.25 mg group and 0.60 to 0.47 in the 2.5 mg group. No significant difference in BCVA was observed between the two groups at any time point (P > 0.56). Subgroup analysis showed that intravitreal bevacizumab seemed to be more effective in eyes without any previous diabetic macular edema treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Three monthly intravitreal bevacizumab injections resulted in significant reduction in central foveal thickness and improvements in BCVA in diabetic macular edema patients. Both 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg seemed to have similar treatment efficacy.
机译:目的:评估玻璃体内注射两种不同剂量贝伐单抗(Avastin)治疗弥漫性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效。方法:将52例糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的52只眼随机分为三组,分别每月接受1.25 mg或2.5 mg贝伐单抗的玻璃体内注射。观察患者6个月,并进行光学相干断层扫描中央凹厚度,logMAR最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和不良事件的评估。结果:48例患者的48只眼完成了6个月的随访并进行了分析。在所有随访中,两组平均中央凹厚度均显着降低(P <0.013)。基线和6个月平均logMAR BCVA之间有显着改善,1.25 mg组的平均logMAR BCVA从0.63改善到0.52,2.5 mg组的平均logMAR BCVA从0.63改善到0.47。在任何时间点,两组之间的BCVA均无显着差异(P> 0.56)。亚组分析表明,玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗似乎在没有任何糖尿病黄斑水肿治疗的情况下对眼睛更有效。结论:糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者每月三次玻璃体内贝伐单抗注射可显着降低中央凹中央厚度并改善BCVA。 1.25 mg和2.5 mg似乎都具有相似的治疗功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号