首页> 外文期刊>Review of Industrial Organization >Antitrust and Vertical Integration in 'New Economy' Industries with Application to Broadband Access
【24h】

Antitrust and Vertical Integration in 'New Economy' Industries with Application to Broadband Access

机译:“新经济”产业中的反托拉斯和垂直整合及其在宽带接入中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Whether the firms that supply Internet hardware and software should face restrictions on the use of their property is an important and controversial policy issue. Advocates of "net neutrality" - including President Obama and the current FCC majority - believe that owners of broadband distribution systems (hardware used to distribute Internet and video services) and producers of certain "must-have" video content should be subject to prophylactic regulation that transcends present-day antitrust law enforcement. In the economic terms that are used in debates on competition policy, the concern is with vertical integration that may give firms both the opportunity (through denial of access or price discrimination) and incentive (increased profit) to restrict competition. This paper's central point is that virtually every production process in the economy is vertically integrated, and economics predicts changes in the extent of vertical integration - that is, changes in the boundaries of the firm - in response to changes in relative prices, technology, or institutions. Both vertical integration and changes in the extent of vertical integration are benign characteristics of efficient, dynamic, competitive markets. While there is no shortage of theoretical models in which vertical integration may be harmful, most such models have restrictive assumptions and ambiguous welfare predictions - even when market power is assumed to be present. Empirical evidence that vertical integration or vertical restraints are harmful is weak, compared to evidence that vertical integration is beneficial - again, even in cases where market power appears to be present. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that prophylactic regulation is not necessary, and may well reduce welfare. Sound policy is to wait for ex post evidence of harm to justify interventions in specific cases. Net neutrality, recently enacted by the FCC but subject to judicial review, is an unfortunate idea.
机译:提供Internet硬件和软件的公司是否应在财产使用方面面临限制,这是一个重要且有争议的政策问题。倡导“网络中立”的人-包括奥巴马总统和当前的FCC多数派-认为,宽带分发系统的所有者(用于分发互联网和视频服务的硬件)和某些“必备”视频内容的生产者应受到预防性法规的约束。超越了当今的反托拉斯执法。在有关竞争政策的辩论中所使用的经济学术语中,人们关注的是纵向整合,这可能会给企业提供机会(通过拒绝获取或价格歧视)和激励(增加利润)来限制竞争。本文的中心点是,实际上,经济中的每个生产过程都是垂直整合的,经济学预测垂直整合程度的变化(即企业边界的变化)是对相对价格,技术或经济变化的反应。机构。纵向整合和纵向整合程度的变化都是有效,动态,竞争性市场的良性特征。尽管不存在垂直整合可能有害的理论模型,但大多数此类模型都具有限制性假设和模糊的福利预测,即使假定存在市场支配力也是如此。与纵向整合是有益的证据相比,纵向整合或纵向约束是有害的经验证据是微弱的,即使在似乎存在市场支配力的情况下。因此,有理由认为没有必要进行预防性调节,并且可以很好地减少福利。合理的政策是等待事后证明损害的证据,以证明在特定情况下的干预是正确的。 FCC最近颁布了一项关于网络中立的规定,但此举受到司法审查,这是一个不幸的想法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号