首页> 外文期刊>Review of Industrial Organization >Market Power, Transactions Costs, and the Entry of Accountable Care Organizations in Health Care
【24h】

Market Power, Transactions Costs, and the Entry of Accountable Care Organizations in Health Care

机译:市场支配力,交易成本和责任医疗组织进入卫生保健

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ACOs were promoted in the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) to incentivize integrated care and cost control. Because they involve vertical and horizontal collaboration, ACOs also have the potential to harm competition. In this paper, we analyze ACO entry and formation patterns with the use of a unique, proprietary database that includes public (Medicare) and private ACOs. We estimate an empirical model that explains county-level ACO entry as a function of: physician, hospital, and insurance market structure; demographics; and other economic and regulatory factors. We find that physician concentration by organization has little effect. In contrast, physician concentration by geographic site-which is a new measure of locational concentration of physicians-discourages ACO entry. Hospital concentration generally has a negative effect. HMO penetration is a strong predictor of ACO entry, while physician-hospital organizations have little effect. Small markets discourage entry, which suggests economies of scale for ACOs. Predictors of public and private ACO entry are different. State regulations of nursing and the corporate practice of medicine have little effect.
机译:ACO在《 2010年患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案》(ACA)中得到了推广,以激励综合医疗和成本控制。由于参与纵向和横向合作,ACO也有可能损害竞争。在本文中,我们使用包括公共(医疗保险)和私有ACO在内的独特专有数据库来分析ACO进入和形成模式。我们估计了一个经验模型,该模型可以解释县级ACO进入的功能:医师,医院和保险市场结构;人口统计资料;以及其他经济和监管因素。我们发现按组织集中医师几乎没有影响。相比之下,按地理位置划分的医师集中度(这是对医师位置集中度的一种新度量)会阻止ACO进入。医院集中通常会产生负面影响。 HMO渗透率是ACO进入的有力预测指标,而医师-医院组织的影响很小。小市场不鼓励进入市场,这暗示了ACO的规模经济。公开和私有ACO进入的预测因素是不同的。国家护理法规和医药企业惯例影响不大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号