...
首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Comparison of four global FAPAR datasets over Northern Eurasia for the year 2000
【24h】

Comparison of four global FAPAR datasets over Northern Eurasia for the year 2000

机译:比较2000年北欧亚大陆的四个全球FAPAR数据集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR) has been identified as one of several key satellite-derived biophysical datasets. With multiple global FAPAR datasets now available and a lack of in-situ measurements and comparison studies in the far north, this study attempts to provide the reader with an indication of the performance of four global FAPAR datasets (MODIS, CYCLOPES, JRC and GLOBCARBON) over Northern Eurasia in the year 2000 via comparison. Within the year 2000 growing season, both the MODIS and CYCLOPES datasets recorded on average similar but substantially higher values than the JRC and GLOBCARBON datasets.Among three of the four datasets, a high level of agreement in deciduous broadleaf forests and croplands was observed. Largest disagreement occurred among needleleaf forests and grassland/shrubland. Potential reasons for discrepanciesamong the datasets include different retrieval methods, use of LAI and land cover, snow effects and others. Findings from this study and other published results suggest that overall, JRC best captures FAPAR over northern Eurasia in the year 2000. However,when considering individual landcover types, any one or more of the four productsmay be suitable. There exists a real need formore in-situmeasurements in this region— the lack of such measurements makes evaluation extremely difficult. It appears that areas north of 60° urgently require further investigation.
机译:被吸收的光合有效辐射分数(FAPAR)已被确定为几个关键的卫星生物物理数据集之一。由于现在有多个可用的全球FAPAR数据集,并且在遥远的北部缺乏现场测量和比较研究,本研究试图为读者提供四个FAFA全局数据集(MODIS,CYCLOPES,JRC和GLOBCARBON)的性能指标。比较一下2000年北欧亚大陆在2000年的生长季节内,MODIS和CYCLOPES数据集的平均记录值均与JRC和GLOBCARBON数据集相似但明显更高,在这四个数据集中的三个数据集中,落叶阔叶林和农田的一致性很高。针叶林和草地/灌木丛之间的分歧最大。数据集差异的潜在原因包括不同的检索方法,LAI和土地覆盖的使用,积雪影响等。这项研究的结果和其他已发表的结果表明,总体而言,JRC在2000年能最好地捕获欧亚大陆北部的FAPAR。但是,当考虑单个土地覆被类型时,四种产品中的任何一种或多种可能都是合适的。确实需要在该区域进行更多的现场测量,因为缺少此类测量使得评估非常困难。似乎急需进一步调查60°以北的地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号