首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Evaluation of organ-specific peripheral doses after 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional and hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer based on Monte Carlo and convolution/superposition algorithms: Implications for secondary cancer risk assessment
【24h】

Evaluation of organ-specific peripheral doses after 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional and hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer based on Monte Carlo and convolution/superposition algorithms: Implications for secondary cancer risk assessment

机译:基于蒙特卡洛和卷积/叠加算法的乳腺癌二维,3维和混合强度调制放射治疗后器官特异性周围剂量的评估:对继发性癌症风险评估的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background and purpose: To make a comprehensive evaluation of organ-specific out-of-field doses using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for different breast cancer irradiation techniques and to compare results with a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Materials and methods: Three breast radiotherapy techniques using 6MV tangential photon beams were compared: (a) 2DRT (open rectangular fields), (b) 3DCRT (conformal wedged fields), and (c) hybrid IMRT (open conformal + modulated fields). Over 35 organs were contoured in a whole-body CT scan and organ-specific dose distributions were determined with MC and the TPS. Results: Large differences in out-of-field doses were observed between MC and TPS calculations, even for organs close to the target volume such as the heart, the lungs and the contralateral breast (up to 70% difference). MC simulations showed that a large fraction of the out-of-field dose comes from the out-of-field head scatter fluence (>40%) which is not adequately modeled by the TPS. Based on MC simulations, the 3DCRT technique using external wedges yielded significantly higher doses (up to a factor 4-5 in the pelvis) than the 2DRT and the hybrid IMRT techniques which yielded similar out-of-field doses. Conclusions: In sharp contrast to popular belief, the IMRT technique investigated here does not increase the out-of-field dose compared to conventional techniques and may offer the most optimal plan. The 3DCRT technique with external wedges yields the largest out-of-field doses. For accurate out-of-field dose assessment, a commercial TPS should not be used, even for organs near the target volume (contralateral breast, lungs, heart). ? 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology.
机译:背景与目的:使用蒙特卡洛(MC)模拟对不同的乳腺癌照射技术进行器官特异性场外剂量的全面评估,并将结果与​​商业治疗计划系统(TPS)进行比较。材料和方法:比较了使用6MV切向光子束的三种乳房放射治疗技术:(a)2DRT(开放矩形场),(b)3DCRT(共形楔形场)和(c)混合IMRT(开放共形+调制场)。在全身CT扫描中勾勒出35个以上的器官轮廓,并通过MC和TPS确定器官特异性剂量分布。结果:在MC和TPS计算之间,即使对于接近目标体积的器官(例如心脏,肺部和对侧乳房),在场外剂量上也观察到很大差异(相差高达70%)。 MC仿真显示,场外剂量的很大一部分来自场外头部散射通量(> 40%),而TPS并未对此进行充分建模。根据MC模拟,使用外部楔形物的3DCRT技术产生的剂量(在骨盆中高达4-5倍)明显高于2DRT和混合IMRT技术,后者产生类似的场外剂量。结论:与普遍的看法形成鲜明对比的是,与常规技术相比,此处研究的IMRT技术不会增加野外剂量,可能会提供最佳方案。具有外部楔形的3DCRT技术产生最大的场外剂量。为了进行准确的野外剂量评估,即使对于目标体积附近的器官(对侧乳房,肺,心脏),也不应使用商用TPS。 ? 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。放射疗法和肿瘤学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号