...
首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing of Environment: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM plus , Quickbird) synergy
【24h】

Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM plus , Quickbird) synergy

机译:使用多传感器(LiDAR,SAR / InSAR,ETM plus,Quickbird)协同作用绘制森林结构图以进行野生生物栖息地分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Measurements of forest structure are important for wildlife habitat management. An optimal strategy for mapping forest structure would include detailed measurements of the vertical dimension, which are traditionally provided by field sampling, together with the broad spatial coverage afforded by remote sensing. While no single sensor is capable of delivering this at the present time, it should be possible to combine information from multiple sensors to achieve a reasonable approximation. In this study, we compare estimates of forest structural metrics derived from remote sensing to measurements obtained in the field (large tree maximum canopy height, mean canopy height, standard deviation canopy height, and biomass). We then statistically combine structural information from LiDAR, RaDAR, and passive optical sensors in an attempt to improve accuracy of our estimates. The results of this study indicate that LiDAR is the best single sensor for estimating canopy height and biomass. The addition of ETM+ metrics significantly improved LiDAR estimates of large tree structure, while Quickbird and InSAR/SAR improved estimates either marginally or not at all. The combination of all sensors was more accurate than LiDAR alone, but only marginally better than the combination of LiDAR and ETM+. Structure metrics from LiDAR and RaDAR are essentially redundant, as are ETM+ and Quickbird. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:森林结构的测量对于野生动植物栖息地的管理很重要。绘制森林结构的最佳策略将包括垂直尺寸的详细测量,传统上是由田间采样提供的,以及遥感所提供的广泛的空间覆盖。虽然目前没有单个传感器能够提供此功能,但应该可以合并来自多个传感器的信息以实现合理的近似值。在这项研究中,我们将通过遥感得出的森林结构指标的估计值与在野外获得的测量值(大树最大冠层高度,平均冠层高度,标准偏差冠层高度和生物量)进行比较。然后,我们将LiDAR,RaDAR和无源光学传感器的结构信息进行统计组合,以尝试提高估算的准确性。这项研究的结果表明,LiDAR是估计冠层高度和生物量的最佳单一传感器。 ETM +指标的添加大大改善了对大树结构的LiDAR估计,而Quickbird和InSAR / SAR则改善了一点或根本没有改善。所有传感器的组合比单独的LiDAR更准确,但仅比LiDAR和ETM +的组合略好。 LiDAR和RaDAR的结构指标本质上是冗余的,ETM +和Quickbird也是。 (c)2006 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号