...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Considerations on treatment efficiency of different conformal radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer.
【24h】

Considerations on treatment efficiency of different conformal radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer.

机译:考虑不同保形放射治疗技术对前列腺癌的治疗效率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND and PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment efficiency of different conformal radiation therapy techniques in prostate cancer. MATERIALS and METHODS: Three major classes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery as well as a conformal rotation technique have been evaluated: sequential tomotherapy, dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) with conventional MLC, DMLC with miniMLC and dynamic field shaping arc. Treatment planning for the IMRT techniques has been performed with inverse planning. Forward planning was used for the dynamic arc technique. The four techniques have been compared to treat two different prostate cases with a conservative target dose of 70 Gy: a convex shaped target volume and one containing concavities formed by the bladder and rectum. Cumulative dose volume histograms, tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability, conformity index and dose heterogeneity, and finally efficiency of treatment delivery have been evaluated. RESULTS: For the convex shaped target, all treatment modalities met the desired treatment goals, although the conventional MLC delivered more dose to the bladder. Compared to the dynamic arc modality, both tomotherapy and the conventional MLC technique needed a tenfold higher number of monitor units per target dose, and the miniMLC a twofold higher number. The same trend has been observed for the concave target, yet the dynamic arc did not meet the desired dose reduction for the rectum. The miniMLC configuration represented the best compromise for both targets with respect to treatment goals and delivery efficiency. Sequential tomotherapy performed adequately with respect to conformity at the cost of efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Together with conformity and delivery efficiency the shape of the target should be considered as an important parameter in the selection of the treatment modality.
机译:背景与目的:评价不同保形放射治疗技术在前列腺癌中的治疗效果。材料和方法:已评估了三种主要类型的强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)传递以及保形旋转技术:顺序层析疗法,采用常规MLC的动态多叶准直(DMLC),采用miniMLC的DMLC和动态场整形弧。 IMRT技术的治疗计划已与反向计划一起执行。前向计划用于动态弧技术。比较了这四种技术,以保守的目标剂量为70 Gy来治疗两种不同的前列腺病例:凸形目标体积和一个包含由膀胱和直肠形成的凹面的目标体积。评估了累积剂量体积直方图,肿瘤控制概率和正常组织并发症概率,整合指数和剂量异质性,最后评估了治疗的效率。结果:对于凸形靶,尽管传统的MLC可以将更多的剂量输送到膀胱,但所有治疗方式均达到了所需的治疗目标。与动态电弧方式相比,断层治疗和常规MLC技术每目标剂量需要的监视单元数量增加十倍,而miniMLC的监视单元数目增加两倍。对于凹形靶已经观察到了相同的趋势,但是动态电弧不能满足直肠所需的剂量减少。 miniMLC配置代表了两个目标在治疗目标和输送效率方面的最佳折衷方案。就合格性而言,顺序断层放疗已充分进行,但以效率为代价。结论:靶标的形状与顺应性和输送效率一起应被视为选择治疗方式的重要参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号