...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >Evaluation of dose calculation algorithms for dynamic arc treatments of head and neck tumors.
【24h】

Evaluation of dose calculation algorithms for dynamic arc treatments of head and neck tumors.

机译:头颈部肿瘤动态电弧治疗剂量计算算法的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate if the Pencil Beam (PB) algorithm takes the disturbance of the dose distribution due to tissue inhomogeneities sufficiently into account in dynamic field shaping rotation therapy (called the dynamic arc treatment modality) for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A treatment plan using the dynamic arc treatment modality of an oropharynx lesion on a humanoid phantom was evaluated. The same plan was calculated with three different calculation algorithms: the Clarkson and the PB algorithm (both available on the planning system of the Novalis((R)) system used for dynamic arc treatments), and the Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition (CC) algorithm (used by the Pinnacle((R)) planning system). The three resulting plans are compared using isodose distributions and cumulative dose volume histograms (CDVHs). An intercomparison of the results of the three algorithms was performed to investigate how accurately each of them takes the influence of tissue inhomogeneities into account such as bony structures and air cavities often appearing in the head and neck region. Additionally, the resulting plans were compared with absolute and relative dosimetric measurements of the treatment plan on the humanoid phantom with thermoluminescent detectors and radiographic film, respectively.RESULTS: All calculated dose distributions show a good agreement with the measured distribution except in the planning target volume (PTV) in and at the border of the air cavity. All three algorithms overestimate the dose in the PTV at the boundary with the low-density tissue, with 12, 10 and 7% for the Clarkson, the PB and the CC algorithm, respectively. The correspondence between the calculated dose distributions is reflected in the graphs of the CDVHs. They show similar curves for the PTV and the structures except for the left parotic gland and the myelum.CONCLUSIONS: The PB algorithm of the Novalis((R)) system calculates a treatment plan for the dynamic arc treatment modality adequately for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors, except in the PTV in and at the border of the air cavity where the actual dose is overestimated. Care needs to be taken in clinical cases where it is critical to irradiate the air-tissue boundary to a sufficient dose.
机译:背景与目的:研究笔形束(PB)算法是否在针对头部和头部的局部立体定向放射治疗的动态场整形旋转疗法(称为动态电弧治疗方式)中充分考虑了由于组织不均匀性引起的剂量分布干扰材料与方法:使用人形幻影上口咽部病变的动态弧线治疗方式,评估了治疗计划。使用三种不同的计算算法来计算相同的计划:Clarkson和PB算法(均可在用于动态电弧处理的Novalis(R)系统的计划系统上使用),以及折叠圆锥卷积叠加(CC)算法(由Pinnacle(R)计划系统使用)。使用等剂量分布和累积剂量体积直方图(CDVHs)比较了三个结果计划。对这三种算法的结果进行了比较,以研究每种算法如何准确地考虑到组织不均匀性的影响,例如经常出现在头部和颈部区域的骨结构和气孔。此外,将所得计划与使用热致发光探测器和X射线胶片分别对人形体模进行治疗计划的绝对和相对剂量测量进行了比较。结果:除了计划的目标体积外,所有计算的剂量分布均与测量的分布显示出良好的一致性(PTV)在气腔内和气道边界内。这三种算法都高估了低密度组织边界处PTV中的剂量,其中Clarkson,PB和CC算法分别高出12、10和7%。计算出的剂量分布之间的对应关系反映在CDVHs的图中。它们显示了PTV及其结构的相似曲线,除了左侧腮腺和骨髓。结论:Novalis(R)系统的PB算法可以为分级立体定向放射治疗充分地计算出动态电弧治疗方式的治疗计划。头颈部肿瘤的发生率,除了在PTV中以及在空气边界处和边界处高估了实际剂量之外。在临床情况下需要谨慎,在这些情况下,必须以足够的剂量照射空气组织边界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号