首页> 外文期刊>Resource and energy economics >Can a unilateral carbon tax reduce emissions elsewhere?
【24h】

Can a unilateral carbon tax reduce emissions elsewhere?

机译:单边碳税可以减少其他地方的排放吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

tOne country or sector that tries to reduce greenhouse gas emis-sions may fear that other countries or sectors will get a competitiveadvantage and increase emissions. Computable general equilibrium(CGE) models such as Elliott et al. (2010a, 2010b) indicate that15-25% of abatement might be offset by this "leakage." Yet theFullerton et al. (2012) simple two-sector analytical general equi-librium model shows an offsetting term with negative leakage. Inthis paper, we use a full CGE model with many countries and manygoods to measure effects in a way that allows for this negativeleakage term. We vary elasticities of substitution and confirm theanalytical model's prediction that whether this negative leakageterm offsets the positive leakage terms depends on the ability ofconsumers to substitute into the untaxed good relative to the abil-ity of firms to substitute from carbon emissions into labor or capital.
机译:一个试图减少温室气体排放的国家或部门可能会担心其他国家或部门会获得竞争优势并增加排放。可计算的一般均衡模型(CGE),例如Elliott等。 (2010a,2010b)指出,这种“泄漏”可能抵消了15-25%的减排量。然而,富勒顿等人。 (2012年)简单的两部门分析一般均衡模型显示了带有负泄漏的抵消项。在本文中,我们使用具有许多国家和许多商品的完整CGE模型,以允许使用此负泄漏项的方式来衡量影响。我们改变了替代弹性,并确认了分析模型的预测,即该负泄漏项是否抵消了正泄漏项取决于消费者相对于企业将碳排放替代为劳动力或资本的能力来替代未税商品的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号