首页> 外文期刊>Biological Theory: integrating development, evolution & cognition >Gender and Politics Among Anthropologists in the Units of Selection Debate
【24h】

Gender and Politics Among Anthropologists in the Units of Selection Debate

机译:选择论辩论中人类学家的性别与政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years evolutionary theorists have been engaged in a protracted and bitter disagreement concerning how natural selection affects units such as genes, individuals, kin groups, and groups. Central to this debate has been whether selective pressures affecting group success can trump the selective pressures that confer advantage at the individual level. In short, there has been a debate about the utility of group selection, with noted theorist Steven Pinker calling the concept useless for the social sciences. We surveyed 175 evolutionary anthropologists to ascertain where they stood in the debate. We found that most were receptive to group selection, especially in the case of cultural group selection. The survey also revealed that liberals andconservatives, and males and females, all displayed significant differences of opinion concerning which selective forces were important in humanity's prehistory. We conclude by interpreting these findings in the context of recent research in political psychology.
机译:近年来,关于自然选择如何影响诸如基因,个体,亲属和群体等单位的问题,进化理论家陷入了旷日持久的痛苦争论。这场辩论的中心在于,影响团队成功的选择性压力是否能胜过赋予个人优势的选择性压力。简而言之,关于群体选择的效用一直存在争议,著名的理论家史蒂文·平克(Steven Pinker)称这一概念对社会科学毫无用处。我们调查了175位进化人类学家,以确定他们在辩论中的立场。我们发现大多数人都接受群体选择,特别是在文化群体选择的情况下。调查还显示,自由主义者和保守主义者,以及男性和女性,都对哪些选择性力量在人类史前时期很重要存在着明显的分歧。最后,我们在政治心理学的最新研究背景下解释这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号