首页> 外文期刊>Research evaluation >Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey
【24h】

Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey

机译:社会科学和人文科学书籍出版者的评估:调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Books are a key channel in the scientific communication processes for researchers in Social Sciences and Humanities. Although the best way of assessing the monographs would involve its individualized reading, this method is practically unfeasible both in terms of cost and time. An indicator which could be used is the prestige of the publisher of monographs and it is essential to take into account the academy's opinion to determine it. This article reports a survey launched to 11,647 lecturers and Spanish researchers, with a response rate of 26%, in which the respondents were asked to point those quality indicators they consider the most relevant for books as well as their opinion on the quality of publishers. As the main results, there are reported the top-rated publishers, as well as the characteristics which, according to the respondents' opinion, determine their quality; among these characteristics, stands out the fact of counting with an assessment system with external reviewers. Regarding the list of publishers, it is also explained the indicator which allows its ranking. It is also defended the use of the results in the form of categorization.
机译:对于社会科学和人文学科的研究人员而言,书籍是科学交流过程中的重要渠道。尽管评估专着的最佳方法将涉及对其的个性化阅读,但是从成本和时间上来说,这种方法实际上是不可行的。可以使用的一个指标是专着的出版商的威望,因此必须考虑到学院的意见来确定。本文报告了一项针对11647名讲师和西班牙研究人员的调查,反馈率为26%,其中要求受访者指出他们认为与书籍最相关的质量指标以及对出版商质量的看法。作为主要结果,报告了排名最高的出版商,以及根据受访者的意见确定其质量的特征;在这些特征中,突出了一个事实,那就是使用由外部审阅者进行的评估系统进行计数。关于发布者列表,还解释了允许对其排名的指标。还捍卫以分类形式使用结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号