首页> 外文期刊>Research in Veterinary Science >Comparison of Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in standing horses
【24h】

Comparison of Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in standing horses

机译:站立马的Fick和热稀释心输出量测定的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Fick and thermodilution (TD) methods are two currently popular techniques for determination of cardiac output (CO) in adult horses. To our knowledge, a comparison of these two techniques has not been reported. Six healthy, resting, fit, adult horses of either sex and weighing 516.5 pl 33.2 kg (mean pl SD) were instrumented to enable measurement of cardiac output. Resting CO was determined by the Fick method and by thermodilution while the horses stood quietly in the stocks. Fick and thermodilution CO measurements were repeated under conditions of increased cardiac output achieved with the use of a dobutamine infusion (5 og kg-1 min-1, IV), and again under conditions of decreased CO induced by administration of xylazine (0.5 mg/kg, IV). Fick and thermodilution cardiac outputs were compared using Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measures. The mean of the differences pl 1.96SD (bias and precision) between the two techniques was 1.88 pl 24.17 L/min. Variability between measurements with the two techniques was decreased to 3.41 pl 46.78 mL kg-1 min-1 when CO was normalized for body size by calculation of cardiac index.
机译:Fick和热稀释(TD)方法是目前用于确定成年马心输出量(CO)的两种流行技术。据我们所知,尚未报道这两种技术的比较。六只健康,休息,健康的成年马,不论性别,体重为516.5 pl 33.2 kg(平均pl SD),都可以用来测量心输出量。静止的CO由Fick方法和热稀释法确定,而马匹则静静地躺在畜群中。在使用多巴酚丁胺输注获得的心输出量增加的条件下(5 ug kg-1 min-1,静脉注射),以及在通过服用甲苯噻嗪诱导的CO降低的条件下,重复进行Fick和热稀释CO测量。公斤,IV)。使用Bland-Altman分析比较了Fick和热稀释心输出量,以进行重复测量。两种技术之间的差异pl 1.96SD(偏差和精度)的平均值为1.88 pl 24.17 L / min。当通过计算心脏指数将CO标准化为身体大小时,两种技术的测量值之间的差异降低至3.41 pl 46.78 mL kg-1 min-1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号