首页> 外文期刊>Research in autism spectrum disorders >A comparison of experimental functional analysis and the Questions about Behavioral Function (QABF) in the assessment of challenging behavior of individuals with autism
【24h】

A comparison of experimental functional analysis and the Questions about Behavioral Function (QABF) in the assessment of challenging behavior of individuals with autism

机译:实验功能分析与行为功能问题(QABF)在自闭症患者挑战行为评估中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We compared two functional behavioral assessment methods: the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF; a standardized test) and experimental functional analysis (EFA) to identify behavioral functions of aggressive/destructive behavior, self-injurious behavior and stereotypy in 32 people diagnosed with autism. Both assessments found that self injurious behavior (SIB) was mostly maintained by automatic reinforcement and escape from task demands. Aggressive/destructive behavior was found to be maintained by escape and access to tangibles, whereas stereotypy was mostly maintained by automatic reinforcement. There was exact agreement on function(s) between the two assessments for 24 participants and partial agreement for six participants. Results suggest that the QABF has clinical utility and is an effective tool for ascribing behavioral function. Implications of the present findings for future assessment of behavioral function are discussed.
机译:我们比较了两种功能性行为评估方法:关于行为功能的问题(QABF;一项标准化测试)和实验性功能分析(EFA),以确定32名被诊断为自闭症的人的攻击性/破坏性行为,自残行为和刻板印象的行为功能。两项评估均发现,自我伤害行为(SIB)大部分是通过自动强化来维持的,并且可以逃避任务要求。发现逃避和接触有形物质可维持侵略性/破坏性行为,而刻板印象主要由自动加固来维持。在两次评估中,有24位参与者对功能进行了准确的协议,而有6位参与者则部分达成了协议。结果表明,QABF具有临床实用性,是一种确定行为功能的有效工具。讨论了本研究结果对未来行为功能评估的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号