...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in developmental disabilities >Development and validation of the Intellectual Disability Literacy Scale for assessment of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes to intellectual disability.
【24h】

Development and validation of the Intellectual Disability Literacy Scale for assessment of knowledge, beliefs and attitudes to intellectual disability.

机译:制定和验证“智力残疾素养量表”,以评估对智力残疾的知识,信念和态度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research into the general public's responses to individuals with intellectual disabilities has been dominated by attitudinal research. While this approach has unquestionably generated useful findings, it ignores important aspects, such as lay knowledge, explanatory models and beliefs about suitable interventions that can produce a multi-faceted understanding of public responses. This paper describes the development of a measure designed to assess respondents' intellectual disability literacy. Following a pilot with 114 participants, the IDLS was revised and then completed by 1376 members of the public (aged 18-78 years) from diverse cultural backgrounds. The measure was able to distinguish respondents who showed good intellectual disability literacy. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed four causal beliefs factors (adversity, biomedical, fate, environment) that accounted for 55% of the variance and three intervention beliefs factors (lifestyle, expert help, religion/spiritual,) that explained 52% of the variance. Test-retest reliability for these factors was good for all ethnic groups. The four-item social distance scale had good internal consistency for all ethnic groups and acceptable concurrent validity. The IDLS is a useful new tool to evaluate knowledge, beliefs and social distance to intellectual disability in lay people, is suitable for cross-cultural research and allows comparison of intellectual disability and mental health literacy in any given population.
机译:态度研究主导了对公众对智障人士反应的研究。尽管这种方法无疑产生了有用的发现,但它忽略了重要方面,例如非专业知识,解释性模型以及对可以产生对公众反应的多方面理解的适当干预措施的信念。本文描述了旨在评估受访者智力残疾素养的一项措施的发展。在有114名参与者的试点之后,对IDLS进行了修订,然后由来自不同文化背景的1376名年龄在18-78岁之间的公众完成。该措施能够区分显示出良好的智力障碍素养的受访者。验证性因素分析显示,四种因果信念因素(逆境,生物医学,命运,环境)占差异的55%,三种干预信念因素(生活方式,专家帮助,宗教/精神等)解释了差异的52%。这些因素的重测信度对所有种族都有良好的效果。四项社会距离量表对所有族裔都有良好的内部一致性,并且可以接受并发效度。 IDLS是一种有用的新工具,可用于评估非专业人士与智障人士的知识,信念和社会距离,适用于跨文化研究,并且可以比较任何给定人群的智障人士和心理健康素养。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号