首页> 外文期刊>Research in developmental disabilities >Quality of life assessment in intellectual disabilities: The Escala Pessoal de Resultados versus the World Health Quality of Life-BREF
【24h】

Quality of life assessment in intellectual disabilities: The Escala Pessoal de Resultados versus the World Health Quality of Life-BREF

机译:智障人士的生活质量评估:埃斯卡拉·埃索拉·埃索拉·德·索亚多斯对世界卫生的生活质量-BREF

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study is to compare the applications of the Escala Pessoal de Resultados (EPR) and the World Health Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) in quality of life (QOL) assessment of people with intellectual disabilities (ID). A total of 216 adults with ID were assessed (age ranging from 18 to 64 years; 128 people were diagnosed with mild, and 88 with moderate ID). The two scales were administered to each person to obtain their perception about their QOL. Statistically significant correlations (weak to moderate) were observed between both scales. The EPR and the WHOQOL-BREF demonstrated adequate reliability, construct, and discriminant validity in our sample. However, the group of adults with moderate ID scored higher on the WHOQOL-BREF than on the EPR. Results indicated that the two assessment instruments aim to evaluate different measures, and seem to be not interchangeable. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较埃斯卡拉·比索结果(EPR)和世界卫生生活质量-BREF(WHOQOL-BREF)在智障人士(ID)的生活质量(QOL)评估中的应用。总共评估了216名有ID的成年人(年龄在18至64岁之间;诊断为轻度的有128人,有88名具有中度的ID)。将这两个量表用于每个人,以了解他们对生活质量的看法。在两个量表之间均观察到统计学上的显着相关性(弱到中等)。 EPR和WHOQOL-BREF在我们的样本中显示出足够的可靠性,结构和判别有效性。但是,具有中等ID的成年人在WHOQOL-BREF上的得分高于在EPR上。结果表明,这两种评估工具旨在评估不同的措施,并且似乎不可互换。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号