...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Comparison of Z-Axis Automatic Tube Current Modulation Technique with Fixed Tube Current CT Scanning of Abdomen and Pelvis.
【24h】

Comparison of Z-Axis Automatic Tube Current Modulation Technique with Fixed Tube Current CT Scanning of Abdomen and Pelvis.

机译:Z轴自动管电流调制技术与腹部和骨盆固定管电流CT扫描的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and radiation exposure associated with 16-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) examinations of abdomen and pelvis performed with z-axis modulation technique of automatic tube current modulation and with manual selection of fixed tube current. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive subjects (mean age, 60 years; age range, 19-84 years; male-to-female ratio, 35:27) underwent follow-up CT of abdomen and pelvis with use of a 16-section multi-detector row scanner and z-axis modulation technique (10.5-12.0-HU noise index, 10-380 mA). Scanning parameters included 140 kVp, 0.5-1.0-second gantry rotation time, 0.938:1 beam pitch, and 5-mm reconstructed section thickness. For each subject, images obtained with z-axis modulation were compared with previous images obtained with fixed tube current (200-300 mA) and with other parameters identical. Images were compared for noise and diagnostic acceptability by two subspecialty radiologists using a five-point scale (1, unacceptable; 3, acceptable; 5, excellent) at five levels: upper liver at diaphragm, porta hepatis, right kidney hilum, iliac crest, and upper margin of acetabulum. Tube current and gantry rotation time used for acquisitions at these levels were recorded. Data were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. RESULTS: Although no significant differences were found (P =.34), images acquired with z-axis modulation at the levels of the upper liver (diaphragm) and acetabulum had a higher noise and lower diagnostic quality, compared with images acquired with fixed tube current. Compared with fixed tube current, z-axis modulation resulted in tube current-time product reduction in 54 (87%) of 62 examinations (mean reduction, 71.2 mAs) and increase in eight (13%) (mean increase, 17.0 mAs). CONCLUSION: Compared with manually selected fixed tube current, z-axis automatic tube current modulation resulted in reduced tube current-time product and similar image noise and diagnostic acceptability at CT of abdomen and pelvis. Copyright RSNA, 2004
机译:目的:比较通过自动管电流调制的z轴调制技术和手动选择固定位置的16节腹部和骨盆多排计算机断层扫描(CT)检查相关的图像质量,诊断可接受性和放射线照射管电流。材料与方法:连续对62例受试者(平均年龄60岁;年龄范围19-84岁;男女比例35:27)进行了腹部和骨盆的CT随访,并使用16位截面多探测器行扫描器和z轴调制技术(10.5-12.0-HU噪声指数,10-380 mA)。扫描参数包括140 kVp,0.5-1.0秒的机架旋转时间,0.938:1的光束间距和5毫米的重建截面厚度。对于每个对象,将通过z轴调制获得的图像与通过固定管电流(200-300 mA)和其他相同参数获得的先前图像进行比较。两位亚专科放射科医生使用五点量表(1分,不可接受; 3分,可接受; 5分,极好)在五个水平上比较图像的噪声和诊断可接受性:diaphragm肌上肝,肝门,右肾门,,和髋臼的上缘。记录在这些水平上用于采集的管电流和机架旋转时间。用参数和非参数统计检验分析数据。结果:尽管没有发现显着差异(P = 0.34),但与固定管获取的图像相比,在上肝(膜片)和髋臼水平通过z轴调制获取的图像具有更高的噪声和更低的诊断质量。当前。与固定灯管电流相比,z轴调制导致62次检查中的灯管电流-时间乘积减少了54次(87%)(平均减少71.2 mAs),而增加了8次(13%)(平均增加了17.0 mAs)。结论:与手动选择固定管电流相比,z轴自动管电流调制可降低管电流时间乘积,并在腹部和骨盆CT上具有相似的图像噪声和诊断可接受性。 RSNA,2004年版权所有

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号