首页> 外文期刊>Cell biochemistry and biophysics >Arthroscopic Characteristics of Normal and Discoid Meniscus Injury, and Efficiency of Recovery in Each Type of Meniscus Injury
【24h】

Arthroscopic Characteristics of Normal and Discoid Meniscus Injury, and Efficiency of Recovery in Each Type of Meniscus Injury

机译:正常和盘状半月板损伤的关节镜特征以及每种半月板损伤的恢复效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to characterize under arthroscopy the features of normal and discoid meniscus injury, and to access the efficiency of recovery after operation. Data from 200 patients with meniscus injury who were admitted between May 2011 and October 2013 were collected. According to the type of meniscus injury, patients were divided into two groups: normal meniscus injury group (100 patients) and discoid meniscus injury group (100 patients). Types of operation and characteristics of joint injury were compared between groups. Further, we compared recovery rates at 1-year postoperative follow-up, using Coriolis knee evaluation of joint functions. We observed five types meniscus tear in patients with normal meniscus: 40 % longitudinal, 32 % radial, 13 % horizontal, 8 % transverse, and 7 % complex. In discoid injury, these were, respectively, 5, 3, 75, 7, and 10 %. Longitudinal, radial, and horizontal injury rates were significantly (p < 0.05) different between both groups. During operation, total, subtotal, and partial resections were utilized for normal meniscus injury in 10, 27, 63 % of cases, and for discoid meniscus injury in 60, 25, and 15 %. Total resection was used significantly more frequently (p < 0.05) in discoid meniscus injury. A postoperative follow-up 1 year later revealed that the rates of excellent, good, and poor recovery were comparable between both normal and discoid meniscus injuries. With more frequent total resection for discoid meniscus injury and patients protecting their knee joints after the operation, the recovery rates are comparable between patients with normal or discoid meniscus injury.
机译:该研究的目的是在关节镜下表征正常和盘状半月板损伤的特征,并获得术后恢复的效率。收集了2011年5月至2013年10月期间收治的200例半月板损伤患者的数据。根据半月板损伤的类型,将患者分为两组:正常半月板损伤组(100例)和盘状半月板损伤组(100例)。比较两组的手术类型和关节损伤的特征。此外,我们使用科里奥利膝关节评估关节功能,比较了术后1年随访的恢复率。我们观察到半月板正常的患者有五种类型的半月板撕裂:纵向40%,径向32%,水平13%,横向8%,复合体7%。在盘状损伤中,它们分别为5%,3%,75%,7%和10%。两组的纵向,径向和水平损伤率显着不同(p <0.05)。术中,全月,次全切除和部分切除用于正常半月板损伤的病例占10%,27%,63%,用于盘状半月板损伤的病例占60%,25%和15%。在盘状半月板损伤中,全切除术的使用频率更高(p <0.05)。一年后的术后随访显示,正常和盘状半月板损伤的恢复率均达到极佳,良好和差。由于盘状半月板损伤的全切除术更加频繁,并且术后患者保护膝关节,因此正常或盘状半月板损伤的患者的恢复率是可比的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号