...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: Can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose
【24h】

Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: Can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose

机译:采用光子计数技术的数字化乳腺X线摄影筛查:在低平均腺体剂量下能否实现较高的诊断性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To assess screening performance of a direct radiography (DR) photon-counting system versus statewide screening units with different digital technologies. Materials and Methods: The local ethics board approved retrospective study of prospectively acquired data from the North Rhine-Westphalian mammography screening program (2009-2010). Informed consent was waived. Examinations in 13 312 women with a DR photon-counting system and statewide digital screening examinations in 993 822 women were included (37 computed radiography mammography systems and 55 DR systems). Diagnostic performance was assessed with cancer detection rate, recall rate, and proportion of small invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Mean glandular dose was calculated for DR photon counting and for a conventional DR subgroup. Differences were tested with x2 and t tests (P < .05). Results: The cancer detection rate for subsequent screenings was higher for DR photon counting than statewide rates (0.76% [67 of 8842] vs 0.59% [3108 of 527 194], P = .05) at a higher recall rate (5.4% [475 of 8842] vs 3.3% [17 656 of 527 194], P = .001). Detection of invasive cancers up to 10 mm for DR photon counting was high for initial (40% [14 of 35]) and subsequent (42% [19 of 45]) screenings but not significantly different from statewide rates (initial, 31.6% [942 of 2979], P = .50; subsequent, 32.5% [765 of 2353], P = .25). The DCIS subsequent screening rate was higher for DR photon counting than statewide screening (0.23% [20 of 8842] vs 0.12% [616 of 527 194], P = .01) and the conventional DR subgroup (0.23% [20 of 8842] vs 0.12% [65 of 52 813], P = .025). Mean glandular dose for DR photon counting was significantly lower than that for conventional DR (0.60 mGy ± 0.20 vs 1.67 mGy ± 0.47 [craniocaudal views], 0.64 mGy ± 0.23 vs 1.79 mGy ± 0.53 [mediolateral oblique views], both P = .0001). Conclusion: Digital mammography screening with dose-efficient photon counting enables desirable detection rates of small invasive cancers and DCIS. Higher detection rates compared with statewide performance occurred with subsequent screening but had higher recall rates.
机译:目的:评估直接放射线照相(DR)光子计数系统与使用不同数字技术的全州范围筛查单元的筛查性能。资料和方法:当地伦理委员会批准了对北莱茵-威斯特法伦州乳房X线摄影筛查程序(2009-2010年)的预期获得数据的回顾性研究。知情同意被放弃。包括对13 312名采用DR光子计数系统的女性进行的检查,以及对993 822名女性进行的全州数字筛查检查(37台计算机放射乳腺摄影系统和55台DR系统)。通过癌症检出率,召回率以及小浸润性癌和导管原位癌(DCIS)的比例来评估诊断性能。计算平均腺体剂量以进行DR光子计数和常规DR亚组。差异用x2和t检验进行了检验(P <.05)。结果:DR子光子计数的后续筛查癌症检出率高于全州范围检出率(0.76%[8862中的67]比0.59%[5278 194中的3108],P = .05),查全率更高(5.4%[ 8842的475] vs 3.3%[527 194的17656],P = .001)。最初的筛查(40%[35分之14])和随后的筛查(42%[45分之19])检出高达10 mm的DR光子计数的浸润性癌,但与全州范围的筛查率(最初的31.6%[ 2979年第942页],P = .50;随后是32.5%[2353年第765页],P = .25)。 DR光子计数的DCIS随后筛查率高于全州筛查(0.23%[8842的20]比0.12%[527 194的616],P = 0.01)和常规DR亚组(0.23%[8842的20])相对于0.12%[52813中的65],P = .025)。 DR光子计数的平均腺体剂量显着低于常规DR(0.60 mGy±0.20对1.67 mGy±0.47 [颅尾视图],0.64 mGy±0.23对1.79 mGy±0.53 [对侧斜视图],两者P = .0001 )。结论:具有高剂量效率光子计数功能的数字化乳腺X线摄影筛查可实现理想的小浸润性癌和DCIS检测率。与随后的筛查相比,全州范围内的检测率更高,但召回率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号