首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
【24h】

Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.

机译:Gadofosveset增强的颈动脉MR血管造影:稳态成像是否可以提高首过成像的准确性?与选择性数字减影血管造影的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of carotid artery stenosis, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard, and to determine the value of reading first-pass, steady-state, and "combined" (first-pass plus steady-state) MR angiograms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed consent. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 84 patients (56 men, 28 women; age range, 61-76 years) with carotid artery stenosis at Doppler ultrasonography. Three readers reviewed the first-pass, steady-state, and combined MR data sets, and one independent observer evaluated the DSA images to assess stenosis degree, plaque morphology and ulceration, stenosis length, and tandem lesions. Interobserver agreement regarding MR angiographic findings was analyzed by using intraclass correlation and Cohen kappa coefficients. Sensitivity, specificity,positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by using the McNemar test to determine possible significant differences (P < .05). RESULTS: Interobserver agreement regarding all MR angiogram readings was substantial. For grading stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, 90%, 92%, 91%, and 91% for first-pass imaging; 95% each for steady-state imaging; and 96%, 99%, 99%, and 97% for combined imaging. For evaluation of plaque morphology, respective values were 84%, 86%, 88%, and 82% for first-pass imaging; 98%, 97%, 98%, and 97% for steady-state imaging; and 98%, 100%, 100%, and 97% for combined imaging. Differences between the first-pass, steady-state, and combined image readings for assessment of stenosis degree and plaque morphology were significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography is a promising technique for imaging carotid artery stenosis. Steady-state image reading is superior to first-pass image reading, but the combined reading protocol is more accurate.
机译:目的:以数字减影血管造影(DSA)为参考标准,评估gadofosveset增强磁共振(MR)血管造影在评估颈动脉狭窄中的诊断准确性,并确定首次通过,稳定,状态和“合并的”(首过加稳态)MR血管造影照片。材料与方法:本研究得到当地伦理委员会的批准,所有受试者均签署了知情同意书。在多普勒超声检查中对84例颈动脉狭窄的患者(56例男性,28例女性,年龄范围61-76岁)进行了MR血管造影和DSA检查。三名读者审阅了首过,稳态和合并的MR数据集,一名独立的观察者评估了DSA图像以评估狭窄程度,斑块形态和溃疡,狭窄长度和串联病变。使用类内相关性和Cohen kappa系数分析了关于MR血管造影结果的观察者之间的一致性。敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)通过McNemar检验确定可能的显着性差异(P <.05)。结果:关于所有MR血管造影读数的观察者之间的共识是实质性的。对于狭窄狭窄,首过成像的敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为90%,92%,91%和91%。稳态成像各95%;对于组合成像,分别为96%,99%,99%和97%。对于斑块形态的评估,首过成像的各自值为84%,86%,88%和82%;稳态成像的98%,97%,98%和97%;对于组合成像,分别为98%,100%,100%和97%。评估狭窄程度和斑块形态的第一遍,稳态和组合图像读数之间的差异是显着的(P <.001)。结论:Gadofosveset增强型MR血管造影是一种有前途的颈动脉狭窄成像技术。稳态图像读取优于首过图像读取,但组合读取协议更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号