...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Acute Cholecystitis: MR Findings and Differentiation from Chronic Cholecystitis.
【24h】

Acute Cholecystitis: MR Findings and Differentiation from Chronic Cholecystitis.

机译:急性胆囊炎:MR与慢性胆囊炎的发现和鉴别。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for differentiation between acute and chronic cholecystitis, with histopathologic analysis as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval with waived informed consent was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Four reviewers blinded to the cholecystitis type but aware that cholecystitis was present retrospectively evaluated MR images for predetermined findings in 32 patients (15 male, 17 female; mean age +/- standard deviation, 55 years +/- 20) with histopathologically proved acute or chronic cholecystitis. The final MR diagnoses and MR findings in both groups were compared with each other and with the histopathologic diagnoses to determine the sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging. chi(2) tests were used to detect differences in MR findings between the acute and chronic cholecystitis groups. Results: MR imaging sensitivity and specificity for detection of acute cholecystitis were 95% (18 of 19 patients) and 69% (nine of 13 patients), respectively. The sensitivities of increased gallbladder wall enhancement and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement were 74% (14 of 19 patients) and 62% (10 of 16 patients), respectively. Both findings had 92% (12 of 13 patients) specificity. Sensitivities of increased wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, and adjacent fat signal intensity changes were 100% (19 of 19 patients), 95% (18 of 19 patients), and 95% (18 of 19 patients), respectively; specificities were 54% (seven of 13 patients), 38% (five of 13 patients), and 54% (seven of 13 patients), respectively. Pericholecystic abscess, intraluminal membranes, and wall irregularity or defect each had 100% (13 of 13 patients) specificity; sensitivities were 11% (two of 19 patients), 26% (five of 19 patients), and 21% (four of 19 patients), respectively. Increased gallbladder wall enhancement (P < .001) and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement (P = .003) were the most significantly different between acute and chronic cholecystitis. Conclusion: Increased gallbladder wall enhancement and increased transient pericholecystic hepatic enhancement had the highest combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis and differentiation of acute and chronic cholecystitis. (c) RSNA, 2007.
机译:目的:以组织病理学分析为参考标准,回顾性分析磁共振成像(MR)对区分急性和慢性胆囊炎的敏感性和特异性。材料和方法:该符合HIPAA的研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并获得了知情同意。四位审阅者对胆囊炎类型不了解,但意识到存在回顾性评估的MR图像,对32例经病理组织学证实为急性或急性的患者(男15例,女17例;平均年龄+/-标准差,55岁+/- 20)进行了预定的发现。慢性胆囊炎。将两组的最终MR诊断和MR结果进行相互比较,并与组织病理学诊断进行比较,以确定MR成像的敏感性和特异性。 chi(2)测试用于检测急性和慢性胆囊炎组之间的MR发现差异。结果:MR成像检测急性胆囊炎的敏感性和特异性分别为95%(19名患者中的18名)和69%(13名患者中的9名)。胆囊壁增强和短暂性胆囊周围性肝增强的敏感性分别为74%(19名患者中的14名)和62%(16名患者中的10名)。两项发现的特异性均为92%(13名患者中的12名)。壁厚,胆囊液和邻近脂肪信号强度改变的敏感性分别为100%(19名患者中的19名),95%(19名患者中的18名)和95%(19名患者中的18名)。特异性分别为54%(13名患者中的7名),38%(13名患者中的5名)和54%(13名患者中的7名)。胆囊周围脓肿,管腔内膜和壁不规则或缺损均具有100%的特异性(13例中有13例)。敏感性分别为11%(19名患者中的两名),26%(19名患者中的五名)和21%(19名患者中的四名)。在急性和慢性胆囊炎之间,胆囊壁增强的增加(P <.001)和短暂性胆囊周围性肝增强(P = .003)是最显着的差异。结论:胆囊壁增强和短暂性胆囊周围肝增强对急性和慢性胆囊炎的诊断和鉴别具有最高的敏感性和特异性的结合。 (c)RSNA,2007年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号